Can someone comment on my second question ? Thanks On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Ryan Rawson <[email protected]> wrote:
> As I suspected. > > It's a byproduct of our maven assembly process. The process could be > fixed. I wouldn't mind. I don't support runtime checking of jars, > there is such thing as too much tests, and this is an example of it. > The check would then need a test, etc, etc. > > At SU we use new directories for each upgrade, copying the config > over. With the lack of -default.xml this is easier than ever (just > copy everything in conf/). With symlink switchover it makes roll > forward/back as simple as doing a symlink switchover or back. I have > to recommend this to everyone who doesnt have a management scheme. > > On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > > hbase/hbase-0.90.1.jar leads lib/hbase-0.90.0.jar in the classpath. > > I wonder > > 1. why hbase jar is placed in two directories - 0.20.6 didn't use such > > structure > > 2. what from lib/hbase-0.90.0.jar could be picked up and why there wasn't > > exception in server log > > > > I think a JIRA should be filed for item 2 above - bail out when the two > > hbase jars from $HBASE_HOME and $HBASE_HOME/lib are of different > versions. > > > > Cheers > > > > On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Ryan Rawson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> What do you get when you: > >> > >> ls lib/hbase* > >> > >> I'm going to guess there is hbase-0.90.0.jar there > >> > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > hbase-0.90.0-tests.jar and hbase-0.90.1.jar co-exist > >> > Would this be a problem ? > >> > > >> > On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Ryan Rawson <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > > >> >> You don't have both the old and the new hbase jars in there do you? > >> >> > >> >> -ryan > >> >> > >> >> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> > .META. went offline during second flow attempt. > >> >> > > >> >> > The time out I mentioned happened for 1st and 3rd attempts. HBase > was > >> >> > restarted before the 1st and 3rd attempts. > >> >> > > >> >> > Here is jstack: > >> >> > http://pastebin.com/EHMSvsRt > >> >> > > >> >> > On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> >> So, .META. is not online? What happens if you use shell at this > >> time. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Your attachement did not come across Ted. Mind postbin'ing it? > >> >> >> > >> >> >> St.Ack > >> >> >> > >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> >> > I replaced hbase jar with hbase-0.90.1.jar > >> >> >> > I also upgraded client side jar to hbase-0.90.1.jar > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > Our map tasks were running faster than before for about 50 > minutes. > >> >> >> However, > >> >> >> > map tasks then timed out calling flushCommits(). This happened > even > >> >> after > >> >> >> > fresh restart of hbase. > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > I don't see any exception in region server logs. > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > In master log, I found: > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > 2011-02-10 18:24:15,286 DEBUG > >> >> >> > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.handler.OpenedRegionHandler: > Opened > >> >> region > >> >> >> > -ROOT-,,0.70236052 on sjc1-hadoop6.X.com,60020,1297362251595 > >> >> >> > 2011-02-10 18:24:15,349 INFO > >> >> >> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.catalog.CatalogTracker: > >> >> >> > Failed verification of .META.,,1 at address=null; > >> >> >> > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.NotServingRegionException: > >> >> >> > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.NotServingRegionException: Region is not > >> >> online: > >> >> >> > .META.,,1 > >> >> >> > 2011-02-10 18:24:15,350 DEBUG > >> >> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.zookeeper.ZKAssign: > >> >> >> > master:60000-0x12e10d0e31e0000 Creating (or updating) unassigned > >> node > >> >> for > >> >> >> > 1028785192 with OFFLINE state > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > I am attaching region server (which didn't respond to > >> stop-hbase.sh) > >> >> >> jstack. > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > FYI > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Stack <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> Thats probably enough Ted. The 0.90.1 hbase-default.xml has an > >> extra > >> >> >> >> config. to enable the experimental HBASE-3455 feature but you > can > >> >> copy > >> >> >> >> that over if you want to try playing with it (it defaults off > so > >> >> you'd > >> >> >> >> copy over the config. if you wanted to set it to true). > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> St.Ack > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >
