I know Ryan is anti runtime check, but since several smart people have been bit by this, seems we could do something simple like look if there are multiple hbase-X.jars where X differs on the classpath?
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 7:36 AM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > Which straggler Andrew, the hbase-0.90.1.jar in lib? That should be > harmless, no? > > Looks like our mvn lib building could do with a bit of weeding. Let > me file an issue for that. > > St.Ack > > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 1:15 AM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Never mind, I read forward further in the thread. > > > > Yes I have a damn straggler in lib/ as well. Seems a packaging fix is in > order. > > > > So -1 on rc0 due to packaging defect. > > > > Best regards, > > > > - Andy > > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. > > - Piet Hein (via Tom White) > > > > > > --- On Fri, 2/11/11, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> From: Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] HBase 0.90.1 rc0 is available for download > >> To: [email protected] > >> Date: Friday, February 11, 2011, 1:11 AM > >> +0 > >> > >> In testing the jgit stuff I noticed that 2 of 3 RS suddenly > >> raised NSRE on META in the logs (under DEBUG level logging). > >> The timing seemed odd. I wasn't sure if this was normal > >> operation or not but Ted's mail now concerns me a lot. > >> > >> I'm at Narita now on the way to Taipei. Will try to > >> reproduce this tomorrow. > >> > >> Best regards, > >> > >> - Andy > >> > >> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting > >> back. > >> - Piet Hein (via Tom White) > >> > >> > >> --- On Wed, 2/9/11, Todd Lipcon <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > From: Todd Lipcon <[email protected]> > >> > Subject: [VOTE] HBase 0.90.1 rc0 is available for > >> download > >> > To: "dev" <[email protected]> > >> > Date: Wednesday, February 9, 2011, 4:27 PM > >> > The HBase team is pleased to announce > >> > the first release candidate for HBase > >> > 0.90.1, available for download at the following URL: > >> > http://people.apache.org/~todd/hbase-0.90.1.rc0/ > >> > > >> > The following is the md5sum: > >> > 27ad96a62966ed217fb6600fa92e2ab4 > >> hbase-0.90.1.tar.gz > >> > and it corresponds to the 0.90.1RC0 tag at r1069174. > >> > > >> > <http://people.apache.org/~todd/hbase-0.90.1.rc0/>HBase > >> > 0.90.1 is a minor > >> > release containing important bug fixes and low-risk > >> > improvements since HBase > >> > 0.90.0. The following is a complete list of tickets > >> > resolved for this minor > >> > release: > >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12315548 > >> > > >> > As a minor release, no migration procedures are > >> necessary > >> > to upgrade from > >> > 0.90.0. Additionally, no public facing APIs should > >> differ > >> > in any way. If you > >> > are upgrading from a previous major release, some > >> caveats > >> > may apply - please > >> > see the relevant documentation for details. All users > >> of > >> > 0.90.0 are advised > >> > to upgrade at their earliest convenience. > >> > > >> > Please vote by Sunday 2/13 whether we should release > >> this > >> > artifact as HBase > >> > 0.90.1. PMC votes are binding, non-PMC votes are as > >> always > >> > very much > >> > appreciated! > >> > > >> > Thanks > >> > The HBase Team > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Todd Lipcon > >> > Software Engineer, Cloudera > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera
