The book is already slightly out of date. Maven 3 is better and handles almost all maven 2 builds pretty seamlessly. I don't see a problem with moving forward rather than back.
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Jesse Yates <jesse.k.ya...@gmail.com> wrote: > So the book says to use Maven 2, rather than Maven 3. Is it just that the > docs are out of date or was there some discussion I'm missing? The only > thing I could find was that we should actually use maven 3 ( > http://search-hadoop.com/m/V9sBo1Kxzab1). > > I feel like Maven 3 is solid at this point (I've been building trunk with > it > pretty consistently) and is pretty standard as far as industry usage. > > Should I just put in a Jira for updating docs? > > Thanks, > Jesse Yates >
