Values corrected. there was a mistake in the number of records
> And here are the details about the test run. > 100 Threads each fetching 10,000 records > 100 threads each adding 10,000 records. > 100 threads each deletin 10,000 records > ( Reads, Writes and deletes simultaneously ) > > Cheers, > Akash A > > > On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 3:25 AM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 2:41 PM, N Keywal <[email protected]> wrote: >> > I would think that the bottleneck for insert is the wal part? >> > It would be possible to do a kind of memory list preparation during the >> wal >> > insertion, and if the wal insertion is confirmed, do the insertion in >> the >> > memory list. But it's strange to have the insertion in memory important >> vs. >> > the insertion on disk... >> > >> >> Yes, WAL is the long pole writing. But MemStore has issues too; >> Dhruba says cpu above. Reading and writing it is also 'slow'. >> St.Ack >> > >
