Mmmm now that I look at it it's older than I thought, we are at 1172312. J-D
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Todd Lipcon <t...@cloudera.com> wrote: > Hey JD/Stack, > > I'm curious: what specific revision number from October are you running at SU? > > As we look towards 0.90.5 it would be good to draw a line in the > branch where we know that it's "known stable for SU", and focus our > testing on patches that came into the branch after that point. > > -Todd > > On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <jdcry...@apache.org> > wrote: >> Hey devs, >> >> I know everyone's focusing on 0.92 and all, but I think we need a >> 0.90.5 to ease some of the support pain. For example, I helped drevell >> on IRC today with something that turned out to be a nasty version of >> HBASE-4168. Basically: >> >> - Shut down the machine that has .META. (or maybe even -ROOT-) >> - Let the master replay the logs >> - Once it's done, it reassigns .META. but the CT's can't find it >> because they are stuck on NoRouteToHostException (that's HBASE-4168) >> - Master is stuck >> - In their case it unstuck itself === >30min later === when they >> rebooted the machine and the master started getting ConnectionRefused >> instead. >> >> There's a lot of other good stuff in there that people might need. At >> SU we've been running on a snapshot of 0.90 from late October. >> >> J-D >> > > > > -- > Todd Lipcon > Software Engineer, Cloudera >
