After fixing the getFileLength() method access bug, the error I'm seeing in
my local multi-process cluster load test is different. Do we ever expect to
see checksum errors on the local filesystem?

11/12/01 22:52:52 INFO wal.HLogSplitter: Splitting hlog:
file:/tmp/hbase-mbautin/hbase/.logs/192.168.1.25
,54409,1322808663310-splitting/192.168.1.25%2C54409%2C1322808663310.1322808734995,
length=25989120
11/12/01 22:52:52 INFO fs.FSInputChecker: Found checksum error: b[3627,
3627]=
org.apache.hadoop.fs.ChecksumException: Checksum error:
file:/tmp/hbase-mbautin/hbase/.logs/192.168.1.25
,54409,1322808663310-splitting/192.168.1.25%2C54409%2C1322808663310.1322808734995
at 25689088
        at
org.apache.hadoop.fs.ChecksumFileSystem$ChecksumFSInputChecker.readChunk(ChecksumFileSystem.java:219)
        at
org.apache.hadoop.fs.FSInputChecker.readChecksumChunk(FSInputChecker.java:237)
        at
org.apache.hadoop.fs.FSInputChecker.read1(FSInputChecker.java:189)
        at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FSInputChecker.read(FSInputChecker.java:158)
        at java.io.DataInputStream.read(DataInputStream.java:132)
        at java.io.DataInputStream.readFully(DataInputStream.java:178)
        at
org.apache.hadoop.io.DataOutputBuffer$Buffer.write(DataOutputBuffer.java:63)
        at
org.apache.hadoop.io.DataOutputBuffer.write(DataOutputBuffer.java:101)
        at
org.apache.hadoop.io.SequenceFile$Reader.next(SequenceFile.java:1937)
        at
org.apache.hadoop.io.SequenceFile$Reader.next(SequenceFile.java:1837)
        at
org.apache.hadoop.io.SequenceFile$Reader.next(SequenceFile.java:1883)
        at
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.wal.SequenceFileLogReader.next(SequenceFileLogReader.java:203)
        at
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.wal.SequenceFileLogReader.next(SequenceFileLogReader.java:177)
        at
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.wal.HLogSplitter.getNextLogLine(HLogSplitter.java:765)
        at
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.wal.HLogSplitter.splitLogFileToTemp(HLogSplitter.java:402)
        at
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.wal.HLogSplitter.splitLogFileToTemp(HLogSplitter.java:351)
        at
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.SplitLogWorker$1.exec(SplitLogWorker.java:113)
        at
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.SplitLogWorker.grabTask(SplitLogWorker.java:266)
        at
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.SplitLogWorker.taskLoop(SplitLogWorker.java:197)
        at
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.SplitLogWorker.run(SplitLogWorker.java:165)

Thanks,
--Mikhail

On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 10:58 PM, Mikhail Bautin <
bautin.mailing.li...@gmail.com> wrote:

> @Stack: I am using hadoop-0.20.205.0 (the default Hadoop version from
> pom.xml). There is a private getFileLength() method, but getMethod() does
> not allow to retrieve it. We should use getDeclaredMethod() -- this appears
> to work in my testing. I will include that fix in the HBaseClusterTest
> diff. Not sure why no one saw this bug before.
>
> @Dhruba: I am running RestartMetaTest, which I am porting from 0.89-fb.
> This is a test that starts a local HBase cluster as multiple processes (on
> different ports), loads some data, and does a real kill -9 on the
> regionserver serving meta. I saw this bug in the data loading part, not
> because of killing the regionserver.
>
> Thanks,
> --Mikhail
>
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 10:33 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 9:59 PM, Mikhail Bautin
>> <bautin.mailing.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > 11/12/01 21:40:07 WARN wal.SequenceFileLogReader: Error while trying to
>> get
>> > accurate file length.  Truncation / data loss may occur if RegionServers
>> > die.
>> > java.lang.NoSuchMethodException:
>> >
>> org.apache.hadoop.fs.ChecksumFileSystem$ChecksumFSInputChecker.getFileLength()
>>
>> Your hadoop doesn't have this Mikhail?
>>
>> > Besides, even when it works, the reflection-based solution is probably
>> > _much_ slower than straightforward method access. Should we create a
>> Hadoop
>> > patch to expose the appropriate API call and get rid of the reflection
>> hack?
>> >
>>
>> It would be the sensible thing to do; much more sensible than the
>> reflection gymnastics we have going on here.
>>
>> St.Ack
>>
>
>

Reply via email to