Absolutely. I'd also throw HBASE-4608 in there.
________________________________ From: Ted Yu <[email protected]> To: [email protected]; lars hofhansl <[email protected]> Cc: Todd Lipcon <[email protected]>; stack <[email protected]>; Jean-Daniel Cryans <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 8:55 PM Subject: time based release Was: code review: HBASE-5231 Backport HBASE-3373 (per-table load balancing) to 0.92 I suggest first completing HBASE-2600 and HBASE-4218 before branching 0.94 We have 5 Jenkins builds so far. After branching, we need to maintain 5 Jenkins builds. Cheers On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 8:33 PM, lars hofhansl <[email protected]> wrote: I agree. As soon as 0.92.0 is released, let's talk about 0.94. > >+1 on time based releases! > > >I think 0.92 shows that not doing frequent releases leads to a lot cruft >accumulating in trunk, which then takes a lot of time to stabalize. > > > > >________________________________ > From: Todd Lipcon <[email protected]> >To: [email protected] >Cc: stack <[email protected]>; lars hofhansl <[email protected]>; Jean-Daniel >Cryans <[email protected]> >Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 10:07 AM >Subject: Re: code review: HBASE-5231 Backport HBASE-3373 (per-table load >balancing) to 0.92 > > >On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: >> I made Fix Version of HBASE-5231 0.92.1 >> >> I can wait till 0.92.0 is released. > >IMO we should push it to 0.94.0. Point releases should be for minor >improvements and bug fixes. The fact that we divert so much energy >into past releases is part of why we're so slow to release the new >ones -- and the long period between the new releases I think >contributes to how unstable trunk gets in the meantime. I won't -1 it >for 0.92.1, but it just seems like a Bad Idea. > >/me goes back to beating the 'we should do time-based releases' drum > >-Todd > >> >> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Todd Lipcon <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Can we please wait until 0.92 is released before we talk about putting >>> more stuff in there? This release process has dragged on for months >>> because we can't seem to say "no". >>> >>> Todd >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > Hi, >>> > The person sitting next to me at the HBase meetup tonight told me that >>> they >>> > once thought of allocating one cluster per table - just to keep regions >>> in >>> > each table balanced. >>> > >>> > With HBASE-5231, you don't have to do that anymore. >>> > >>> > Please review the patch. >>> > >>> > Thanks >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Todd Lipcon >>> Software Engineer, Cloudera >>> > > > >-- >Todd Lipcon >Software Engineer, Cloudera
