It is always better to get in a patch with test case.  But if it takes  a 
little more time to get the test case can we verify the patch with good cluster 
testing and raise a JIRA for the test case integration that Stack gives.

By this way we can get the patch in the release and also satisfies Todd's 
suggestion.

Any comments so that i can raise a test task for the same.

Regards
Ram
________________________________________
From: [email protected] [[email protected]]
Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2012 8:13 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: 0.90.6 Release status

Stack said he would come up with some test for hbase-5179.
Suppose that takes a few more days, do you plan to check in the fix into 0.90 
branch ?

According to Todd's suggestion earlier, a Jira shouldn't be open for too long 
during which time patches continuously get checked in.

Cheers



On Jan 21, 2012, at 4:34 AM, Ramakrishna s vasudevan 
<[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Devs
>
> After the first RC for 0.90.6 was taken
> HBASE-5196 - Failure in region split after PONR could cause region hole
> HBASE-5153 - Add retry logic in 
> HConnectionImplementation#resetZooKeeperTrackers
>
> The above 2 defects have been committed.
>
> HBASE-5179 - Concurrent processing of processFaileOver and 
> ServerShutdownHandler may cause region to be assigned before log splitting is 
> completed, causing data loss
> HBASE-5225 - Backport HBASE-3845 -data loss because lastSeqWritten can miss 
> memstore edits
> HBASE-5235 - HLogSplitter writer thread's streams not getting closed when any 
> of the writer threads has exceptions.
> HBASE-5237 - Addendum for HBASE-5160 and HBASE-4397
>
> HBASE-5179 - is almost in a final stage for committing.  Thanks to Chunhui, 
> Ted and Jinchao for persisting on the defect.
>
> The above defects were found during the testing for RC0. Hence i would like 
> to cut another RC once the above
> defects goes into 0.90.  By tomorrow 22nd January i would like to take a 
> release cut.
> Please let me know your suggestions/opinions.
>
> Regards
> Ram

Reply via email to