"Iron Fist of Lars H"... Uh oh :) 0.96 wire compatibility would be awesome. Seems rather ambitious for 0.94. I am happy to help with that too. Weren't the HortonWorks guys also interested in working on that? Once we have that, we can think about calling it 1.0.
Dare I mention secondary indexes for 0.96? -- Lars ________________________________ From: Jonathan Hsieh <j...@cloudera.com> To: dev@hbase.apache.org; lars hofhansl <lhofha...@yahoo.com> Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 6:36 AM Subject: Re: hbase 0.94.0 +1. I like the list and the simple performance version theme, and seeing what the "Iron Fist of Lars H" is like. :) Can we start talking about goals for 0.96 goal as well? Wire compatibility is one that Jimmy and I are interested in tackling, or possibly adding it as an optional feature in 0.94 to ease the transition. Jon. On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 9:48 PM, lars hofhansl <lhofha...@yahoo.com> wrote: > +1! end of february sounds fine to me > > > My feature wish list: > > HBASE-2600 > HBASE-4218 (done it seems) > HBASE-4608 (also getting close) > > HBASE-5128 > > The usual set of race-condition-fixes... > > > I don't think we'll have tackled wire-compatibility by then. > > > We can call it the 0.94 performance release... > > > -- Lars > > ps. I'm happy to be the release manager if you're tired of it. :) > > > > ________________________________ > From: Stack <st...@duboce.net> > To: HBase Dev List <dev@hbase.apache.org> > Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 8:34 PM > Subject: hbase 0.94.0 > > Lets branch end of february? No new features thereafter. Is this too > close in? Would be grand if 0.94.0 shipped before hbasecon. What > should 0.94.0 have in it? I don't mind if the list is short. > > Unless someone else wants too, I don't mind being release manager > (will try to run a tighter ship this time around). > > St.Ack > -- // Jonathan Hsieh (shay) // Software Engineer, Cloudera // j...@cloudera.com
