I am surprised to see 0.92.1 exhibit such unfavorable performance profile. Let's see whether cluster testing gives us similar results.
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Elliott Clark <ecl...@stumbleupon.com>wrote: > Sure, sorry about that. > > http://imgur.com/waxlS > > http://www.scribd.com/eclark847297/d/92151092-Hbase-0-94-0-RC3-Local-YCSB-Perf > > On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Elliot: > > Thanks for the report. > > Can you publish results somewhere else ? > > Attachments were stripped off. > > > > On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Elliott Clark <ecl...@stumbleupon.com > > >wrote: > > > > > I ran some tests of local filesystem YCSB. I used the 0.90 client for > > > 0.90.6. For the rest of the tests I used 0.92 clients. The results are > > > attached. > > > > > > 0.90 -> 0.94.0RC3 13% faster > > > 0.92 -> 0.94.0RC3 50% faster > > > > > > This seems to be a pretty large performance improvement. I'll run > some > > > tests on a cluster later today. > > > > > > On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 10:20 PM, lars hofhansl <lhofha...@yahoo.com > > >wrote: > > > > > >> Thanks Todd. > > >> > > >> I agree with doing source code releases going forward. > > >> > > >> For that, would it be sufficient to just vote against an SVN tag? > > >> Tarballs can then be pulled straight from that tag. > > >> > > >> -- Lars > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> ----- Original Message ----- > > >> From: Todd Lipcon <t...@cloudera.com> > > >> To: dev@hbase.apache.org; lars hofhansl <lhofha...@yahoo.com> > > >> Cc: > > >> Sent: Tuesday, May 1, 2012 9:35 PM > > >> Subject: Re: ANN: The third hbase 0.94.0 release candidate is > available > > >> for download > > >> > > >> +1 from me, I took it for a spin on the local filesystem with some > YCSB > > >> load. > > >> > > >> Here is my signature on the non-secure tarball. > > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > >> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) > > >> > > >> iEYEABECAAYFAk+guTIACgkQXkPKua7Hfq9YSQCeMnCQ4XFqLjw+PF8IXNPDug+t > > >> h90AoJ+q4YSg4JbfiCmaXenadWSRU1of > > >> =CdfZ > > >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > >> > > >> I didn't check out the secure tarball. > > >> > > >> I think for future releases we should do the voting against a source > tar > > >> (ie an svn export) since we now produce multiple binaries, and it's > > easier > > >> to verify that a source tar matches SVN, etc. > > >> > > >> -Todd > > >> > > >> > > >> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 4:26 PM, lars hofhansl <lhofha...@yahoo.com> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >> > The third 0.94.0 RC is available for download here: > > >> > http://people.apache.org/~larsh/hbase-0.94.0-rc3/ > > >> > (My gpg key is available from pgp.mit.edu. Key id: 7CA45750) > > >> > > > >> > HBase 0.94 is a performance release, and there are some interesting > > new > > >> > features as well. > > >> > > > >> > It is wire compatible with 0.92.x. 0.92 clients should work with > 0.94 > > >> > servers and vice versa. > > >> > > > >> > You can do a rolling restart to get your 0.92.x HBase up on this > > >> 0.94.0RC. > > >> > > > >> > The full list of changes is available here: > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12316419 > > >> > > > >> > Please take this RC for a spin, check out the doc, etc, and vote > +1/-1 > > >> by > > >> > May 8th on whether we should release this as 0.94.0. > > >> > > > >> > Thanks. > > >> > > > >> > -- Lars > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Todd Lipcon > > >> Software Engineer, Cloudera > > >> > > >> > > > > > >
