On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: > Let's consider the following scenario in chronological order: > 0.92.x is released > 0.94.y is released > 0.92.x+1 is released > > Would the stable symlink point alternately to each of the releases as > they're available ?
That would really not work and I'm sure you can think of a few reasons why (like people jumping from 0.94 to 0.92 to 0.94). > > Or should we have two symlinks, one for 0.92 branch, one for 0.94 branch ? Why. J-D
