Hi Enis, Did you find anything usefull from the logs?
JM 2013/3/27 Jean-Marc Spaggiari <jean-m...@spaggiari.org>: > Here you go: > > http://www.spaggiari.org/logs.tar.bz2 > > JMS > > 2013/3/27 Enis Söztutar <enis....@gmail.com>: >> If you can, master and console logs should be fine. >> >> Enis >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari < >> jean-m...@spaggiari.org> wrote: >> >>> Hi Enis, >>> >>> I just retried and now I'm getting: >>> 13/03/27 15:21:22 INFO mapred.JobClient: REFERENCES_CHECKED=9855437 >>> >>> Which log do you want? Master logs? the console ouput? >>> >>> JMS >>> >>> 2013/3/25 Enis Söztutar <enis....@gmail.com>: >>> >> Shoult it not be 10000000 instead of 9855805? >>> > Yes that is very interesting. Could you please post the logs if you have >>> > them. >>> > >>> > Enis >>> > >>> > >>> > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 7:41 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari < >>> > jean-m...@spaggiari.org> wrote: >>> > >>> >> Hi Enis, >>> >> >>> >> What the expected result of the IntegrationTestLoadAndVerify? >>> >> >>> >> I got that on my side: >>> >> 13/03/22 22:36:34 INFO mapred.JobClient: >>> >> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.test.IntegrationTestLoadAndVerify$Counters >>> >> 13/03/22 22:36:34 INFO mapred.JobClient: ROWS_WRITTEN=0 >>> >> 13/03/22 22:36:34 INFO mapred.JobClient: REFERENCES_CHECKED=9855805 >>> >> >>> >> Shoult it not be 10000000 instead of 9855805? >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> 2013/3/22 Enis Söztutar <e...@hortonworks.com>: >>> >> > +1 >>> >> > >>> >> > - verified md5, asc >>> >> > - Build with hadoop 2 and hadoop 1 >>> >> > - Run local mode cluster, and these tests: >>> >> > - bin/hbase org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.LoadTestTool -write >>> 10:10:100 >>> >> > -num_keys 1000000 -read 100:30 >>> >> > - bin/hbase >>> "org.apache.hadoop.hbase.test.IntegrationTestLoadAndVerify >>> >> > -Dloadmapper.backrefs=10 -Dloadmapper.map.tasks=10 >>> >> > -Dloadmapper.num_to_write=100000 -Dverify.reduce.tasks=1 >>> >> > -Dverify.scannercaching=10000 loadAndVerify" >>> >> > bin/hbase "org.apache.hadoop.hbase.test.IntegrationTestBigLinkedList >>> >> Loop >>> >> > 2 1 3000000 /tmp/biglinkedlist 1" >>> >> > >>> >> > Also based on Jeff's tests run on multi-node cluster. >>> >> > >>> >> > Enis >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Jeffrey Zhong < >>> jzh...@hortonworks.com >>> >> >wrote: >>> >> > >>> >> >> +1 based on the test suit I ran, which includes some large tests >>> such as >>> >> >> BigtopLoadAndVerify, LoatTestTool, GoraCI and TestAcidGuarantee. I've >>> >> >> updated the release spreadsheet. >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Thanks, >>> >> >> -Jeffreyz >>> >> >> >>> >> >> On 3/22/13 7:33 AM, "Jean-Marc Spaggiari" <jean-m...@spaggiari.org> >>> >> wrote: >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >Hi, >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >I deployed 0.94.6 on my 8 nodes "production" cluster. >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >Ran some MR jobs (Row count and own MRs), everything went well. >>> >> >> >Ran the test suite (mvn test -P runAllTests), everything went well. >>> >> >> >(Tests run: 1325, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 13) >>> >> >> >Done many operatoins (c.f. google spreadsheet), everything went >>> well. >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >Only thing is we lost 1% in scan performances but this should not >>> sink >>> >> >> >the release. >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >So overall, I'm +1. >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >JM >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >2013/3/22 Jean-Marc Spaggiari <jean-m...@spaggiari.org>: >>> >> >> >> Sorry for the delay. >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> I will test it deeply today and you will have my feedback before >>> EOD. >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> JM >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> 2013/3/22 Stack <st...@duboce.net>: >>> >> >> >>> Hmm. Ignore my +1 from earlier this evening on RC1. >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> Here is a +1 for RC2. >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> Checked md5. >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> Checked signing. >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> Again, multipage book is missing but single page is here so thats >>> >> fine >>> >> >> >>>I'd >>> >> >> >>> say. The javadocs AND the src xref are in this version. >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> Loaded ten million into standalone and scanned verified all >>> loaded. >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> Logs look good. >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> St.Ack >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 9:49 PM, lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org >>> > >>> >> >> >>>wrote: >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>>> Friendly reminder to please have a look (voting period ended >>> >> >> >>>>yesterday). >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> I stress loaded 1bn 1k rows into a test cluster with 15 RS using >>> >> 150 >>> >> >> >>>> mappers, watched key metrics. Besides maxing out our 10ge TOR >>> >> switch >>> >> >> >>>>all >>> >> >> >>>> was good. >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> -- Lars >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> ________________________________ >>> >> >> >>>> From: lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org> >>> >> >> >>>> To: hbase-dev <dev@hbase.apache.org> >>> >> >> >>>> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 6:24 PM >>> >> >> >>>> Subject: [ANNOUNCE] The 3rd hbase 0.94.6 release candidate is >>> >> >> >>>>available >>> >> >> >>>> for download >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> The 3rd and hopefully last 0.94.6 RC is available for download >>> at >>> >> >> >>>> http://people.apache.org/~larsh/hbase-0.94.6-rc2/ >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> Signed with my code signing key: C7CFE328 >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> 0.94.6 is a primarily a bug fix release. This RC has 55 issues >>> >> >> >>>>resolved >>> >> >> >>>> against it, contributed by 28 individuals. >>> >> >> >>>> These are mostly bug fixes. Don't be fooled by the comparatively >>> >> small >>> >> >> >>>> number of issues; one of them is a giant back port of the HBase >>> >> >> >>>>snapshots >>> >> >> >>>> feature. >>> >> >> >>>> RC2 also fixes a nasty replication/restart issue and also pulls >>> in >>> >> all >>> >> >> >>>> fixed committed since the last RC. >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> The full list of changes is available here: >>> >> >> >>>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE/fixforversion/12323907 >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> Please try out the RC, check out the doc, take it for a spin, >>> etc, >>> >> and >>> >> >> >>>> vote +1/-1 by March 20th on whether we should release this as >>> >> 0.94.6. >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> The release testing spreadsheet is available here: >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AvLqcVIqNtlTdGkwN3NIeWw1bG >>> >> >> >>>>JyQkZJMHJVVTB3aHc#gid=0 >>> >> >> >>>> (if you test this release, please add your test to this >>> >> spreadsheet, >>> >> >> >>>>so >>> >> >> >>>> that we can gauge the coverage) >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> Thanks. >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> -- Lars >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >>>
