On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 8:45 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > > > In the patch, it looks to me that v3 is not a true new type but just an > h2 > > w/ tags shoehorned in. Going forward v3 will not be extensible as done. > > > > I think that's a case of only extending what is needed at this time. More > V2 classes can be subclassed or replaced as required? > > It looks like methods are being overloaded to add tags. Overloading to add mvcc was ugly. Tag-effort is compounding this approach. I'd have thought a v3 would do tags, mvcc, etc., natively. Main objection is that the included v3 is not a 'green field'/redo so lets not call it that (My objection is the nomenclature -- if you have to do the overloads to get in your tags, go for it). St.Ack
