Hi Andy, OK, makes sense. Is that something defined somewhere, or more or less common sense, or somehow passed on verbally only?
Cheers, Lars On Jul 29, 2013, at 9:19 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Lars George <[email protected]> wrote: > >> That is exactly my point, ie the former case. If I commit to all major >> branches within a day as is common, but the branches release at various >> times, who is going to close the issue? The release manager who releases >> first? > > > IMHO: > > The commiter should set the state to 'Resolved' after the change is applied > to all desired target branches. > > The RM for the _last_ affected release should set the state to 'Closed', > essentially garbage collecting when refcount goes to 0. > > -- > Best regards, > > - Andy > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein > (via Tom White)
