On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]>wrote:
> > - This is a call for an 0.98 major release in early October. Let's discuss > first if that timeframe is reasonable, and then what can and should go into > a new major release in this timeframe. > > +1 on 0.98 coming on the heels of 0.96. > - I have volunteered to manage this release. Let's discuss if there are > concerns or objections to that. > > +1 > Assuming there are no objections, in a few days I will adjust target > versions for 0.98 in JIRA, file any new issues as needed, and then post a > summary here. I suggest looking at 0.98 through the lens of being the last > release before the big 1.0 event. Therefore, what should go in are things > that almost made the 0.96 cut, and "1.0 necessary" features that, first, > should be in a 1.0 product, and, second, could benefit from one release > cycle to bake. Once there is an 0.98 major release, I also suggest a > regular train of minor releases like what Lars has done for 0.94. Also, I > don't think it necessary to decide today if a 0.98 release should become > the 1.0 release directly, we will always have that option. I suggest > waiting to make that call until 0.98 releases are under test and fielded. > +1 I like the suggestion above that 0.98 is the likely 1.0.0.. or soon after. St.Ack
