To me it feels like HBASE-9724 should go into 0.96. We're not releasing a new rc tonight, it seems really weird to hold up a bug fix to try and hit some unknown, and un-agreed upon, deadline.
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 8:08 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Enis Söztutar <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > Anyways, if you fellas can't wait anymore, just say and we'll figure out >> something. >> As I see it, HBASE-9563 is committed, > > > It is still open and committed with qualification "Stack:...Was going to > try this first but likely needs more..." and "Elliott: +1 I think it's > an improvement even if it doesn't 100% fix the master issue." > > > >> and HBASE-9696 is not a blocker >> against 0.96. But if you argue that 9696 is indeed a blocker, let's raise >> it as such. > > > > Agree. > > > >> There is no point in creating an RC, an immediately sinking it >> if we cannot verify the RC for a +1. We don't run into data loss issues >> anymore which is why I still think we can release 0.96 even without 9696 >> and 9724. Nothing is preventing us to release 0.96.1, with this and more >> fixes in let's say a couple of weeks or months. >> >> I guess let's wait for tomorrow to see whether there is any progress on >> 9563 and 9696. >> > > Yes. Lets take this up tomorrow. Elliott and I are on the master issue, > HBASE-9563, this evening. > > Thanks Enis, > St.Ack >
