Thanks Ted!
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 8:50 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: > Alright. > Plan to stick with previous consensus of 3 file extensions. > > Cheers > > > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Nick Dimiduk <ndimi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I don't think that's a necessary filter; it'll still get false-positives > > like HBASE-1234_design_v1.txt. I'd prefer the automation to be kind and > > understanding in accepting and evaluating community contributions :) > > Running failing to apply a non-patch doesn't really hurt anything. > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Over in HBASE-10017, the following attachment triggered a QA warning: > > > > > > > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12616816/patchSiteOutput.txt > > > > > > Should the acceptance criteria include the notion that there should be > > JIRA > > > number in the filename ? > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 12:39 AM, Anoop John <anoop.hb...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > +1 for .patch, .txt, .diff > > > > > > > > -Anoop- > > > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 6:16 AM, Nick Dimiduk <ndimi...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Sounds reasonable to me. Maybe add .diff to that list? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > During review of > > > > > > HBASE-10044 test-patch.sh should filter out documents by known > > file > > > > > > extensions > > > > > > Jesse made the suggestion that QA bot only accepts files with > > > > extensions > > > > > > .patch > > > > > > and .txt > > > > > > > > > > > > I want to get opinion from the community on this matter. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
