Sorry about that mates, I know I'm late. I was fighting against snappy codec for the last few days and was not able to correctly startup my 0.96.1 version.
So since it's already over, I have done a reduce phase test. Verified the signature, checked the documentation and the CHANGES.txt file. distcp 2TB from a 0.94.x/hadoop 1.0.3 cluster to 0.96.1/hadoop 2.2.0. Ran the migration tool. online merged an entire table to a single region. At the end of all of that I have some inconsistencies in the system reported by HBCK. (Extra regions, empty regioninfo_qualifier in the meta, etc.). I will redo all the steps I did one by one and run HBCK between each to see where it failed and report what I found. Next step will be to enable replication between my 0.94 and my 0.96 clusters. JM 2013/12/16 Stack <st...@duboce.net> > Vote passes with 4 binding +1s and 1 non-binding. > > Let me push out the release. > > St.Ack > > > On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > I started it over a cluster that had data written with trunk and it came > > up fine. I ran a loading and no untoward exceptions. > > > > Download looks right. md5 checks out. > > > > Any more +1's out there? > > > > St.Ack > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > > > >> The third hbase-0.96.1 release candidate is available for download: > >> > >> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.96.1RC2/ > >> > >> The maven artifacts are available here: > >> > >> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-037/ > >> > >> 152 issues [1] have been fixed since 0.96.0, mostly performance > >> improvement > >> and bug fixes. > >> > >> Shall we release this as hbase-0.96.1? Please vote by Monday, December > >> 16th. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Your HBase Team > >> > >> 1. http://goo.gl/ZgYBW2 > >> > > > > >