Haha ;) Yes. UI. Under the page details in the WebUI, In previous release
(maybe not 0.94.16 because I did not test it) when clicking split in the
WebUI, table was split in half. Now, page is split according to the
MAX_FILESIZE
parameter until all regions are according to it.

I'm not 100% sure about it so might be wrong. But I'm not sure I have seen
that before.


2014-02-23 8:32 GMT-05:00 Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com>:

> bq. Click split under UA
>
> I guess you meant 'under UI'
>
> Cheers
>
> On Feb 23, 2014, at 4:47 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <jean-m...@spaggiari.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Tested, tl.tr: +1 ;)
> >
> > All tests are done with Oracle JDK 1.7.0_45 + Hadoop 1.2.1 (Except for
> the
> > 0.96.1 test where Hadoop 2.2.0 is used)
> >
> > Checked the jars, the signature, the CHANGES.TXT file, the documentation
> =>
> > Passed.
> > Checked logs, UI, HBCK, test suite => Passed
> > Run all Performances tests => Passed. 0.94.17 performances just a bit
> under
> > 0.94.16. RandomReadTest 15% slower with 0.94.17. Will retest it. Will
> post
> > all the numbers in detail in my blog later today.
> >
> > Only concern is again the IntegrationTestLoadAndVerify result where I
> don't
> > have the exptected result, but it's the same thing with 0.94.16 and
> 0.96.1
> > too. With difference Hadoop version.
> >
> >
> > 0.94.16 + Hadoop 1.2.1:
> > 14/02/21 21:22:19 INFO mapred.JobClient:
> > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.test.IntegrationTestLoadAndVerify$Counters
> > 14/02/21 21:22:19 INFO mapred.JobClient:     ROWS_WRITTEN=0
> > 14/02/21 21:22:19 INFO mapred.JobClient:     REFERENCES_CHECKED=9855584
> >
> > 0.94.17 + Hadoop 1.2.1:
> > 14/02/21 21:31:28 INFO mapred.JobClient:
> > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.test.IntegrationTestLoadAndVerify$Counters
> > 14/02/21 21:31:28 INFO mapred.JobClient:     ROWS_WRITTEN=0
> > 14/02/21 21:31:28 INFO mapred.JobClient:     REFERENCES_CHECKED=9855909
> >
> > 0.96.1 + Hadoop 2.2.0:
> > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.test.IntegrationTestLoadAndVerify$Counters
> > REFERENCES_CHECKED=9855588
> >
> > Create table, put, scan, compact => Passed.
> > Offline merged all regions into a single one, hbck, split => Passed.
> > Rolling restart => Failed once because of jar push issue (my bad),
> retried
> > => Passed.
> > Ran all tests (LoadTestTool, IntegrationTestLoadAndVerify,
> > HLogPerformanceEvaluation, IntegrationTestBigLinkedList) on a 4 nodes
> > cluster => Passed.
> > When we click split in the UA, seems to trigger major compaction, which
> was
> > not the case before (Not sure in which version this has been introduced)
> >
> > Summary:
> > - IntgrationTestLoadAndVerify results still "strange";
> > - Split behaviour in the UA seem the have changed.
> > - +1
> >
> > JM
> > PS: Go Canada Go!
> >
> > 2014-02-21 10:01 GMT-05:00 Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com>:
> >
> >> +1 based on the following:
> >>
> >> 1. Ran test suite using JDK 1.7 - pass
> >> 2. compiled Phoenix with locally built 0.94.17 - pass
> >> 3. checked the documentation
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 11:18 PM, lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> +1
> >>>
> >>> - checked documentation and tarball
> >>>
> >>> - Ran in local and distributes mode
> >>> - checked the UI pages
> >>>
> >>> - loaded 100m KeyValues
> >>> - tested scan performance
> >>>
> >>> - converted between FAST_DIFF and NONE encoding
> >>> - tested flushes and compactions
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -- Lars
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ________________________________
> >>> From: lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org>
> >>> To: hbase-dev <dev@hbase.apache.org>
> >>> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 8:31 PM
> >>> Subject: [VOTE] The 2nd hbase 0.94.17 release candidate is available
> for
> >>> download
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> The 2nd 0.94.17 RC is available for download at
> >>> http://people.apache.org/~larsh/hbase-0.94.17-rc1/
> >>> Signed with my code signing key: C7CFE328
> >>>
> >>> HBase 0.94.17 is a bug fix release with 35 fixes:
> >>>    [HBASE-7963] - HBase VerifyReplication not working when security
> >>> enabled
> >>>    [HBASE-10249] - TestReplicationSyncUpTool fails because failover
> >> takes
> >>> too long
> >>>    [HBASE-10274] - MiniZookeeperCluster should close ZKDatabase when
> >>> shutdown ZooKeeperServers
> >>>    [HBASE-10319] - HLog should roll periodically to allow DN
> >> decommission
> >>> to eventually complete.
> >>>    [HBASE-10320] - Avoid ArrayList.iterator() ExplicitColumnTracker
> >>>    [HBASE-10335] - AuthFailedException in zookeeper may block
> >> replication
> >>> forever
> >>>    [HBASE-10340] - [BACKPORT] HBASE-9892 Add info port to ServerName to
> >>> support multi instances in a node
> >>>    [HBASE-10363] - [0.94] TestInputSampler and TestInputSamplerTool
> fail
> >>> under hadoop 2.0/23 profiles.
> >>>    [HBASE-10371] - Compaction creates empty hfile, then selects this
> >> file
> >>> for compaction and creates empty hfile and over again
> >>>    [HBASE-10383] - Secure Bulk Load for 'completebulkload' fails for
> >>> version 0.94.15
> >>>    [HBASE-10400] - [hbck] Continue if region dir missing on region
> merge
> >>> attempt
> >>>    [HBASE-10401] - [hbck] perform overlap group merges in parallel
> >>>    [HBASE-10448] - ZKUtil create and watch methods don't set watch in
> >>> some cases
> >>>    [HBASE-10470] - Import generates huge log file while importing large
> >>> amounts of data
> >>>    [HBASE-10481] - API Compatibility JDiff script does not properly
> >>> handle arguments in reverse order
> >>>    [HBASE-10482] - ReplicationSyncUp doesn't clean up its ZK, needed
> for
> >>> tests
> >>>    [HBASE-10485] - PrefixFilter#filterKeyValue() should perform
> >> filtering
> >>> on row key
> >>>    [HBASE-10489] - TestImportExport fails in 0.94 with Hadoop2
> >>>    [HBASE-10493] - InclusiveStopFilter#filterKeyValue() should perform
> >>> filtering on row key
> >>>    [HBASE-10501] - Improve IncreasingToUpperBoundRegionSplitPolicy to
> >>> avoid too many regions
> >>>    [HBASE-10505] - Import.filterKv does not call Filter.filterRowKey
> >>>    [HBASE-10506] - Fail-fast if client connection is lost before the
> >> real
> >>> call be executed in RPC layer
> >>>    [HBASE-10508] - Backport HBASE-10365 'HBaseFsck should clean up
> >>> connection properly when repair is completed' to 0.94 and 0.96
> >>>    [HBASE-10539] - HRegion.addAndGetGlobalMemstoreSize returns previous
> >>> size
> >>>    [HBASE-10545] - RS Hangs waiting on region to close on shutdown; has
> >>> to timeout before can go down
> >>>    [HBASE-10546] - Two scanner objects are open for each hbase map task
> >>> but only one scanner object is closed
> >>>    [HBASE-10551] - Change local mode back to one RS thread by default
> >>>    [HBASE-10552] -
> >> HFilePerformanceEvaluation.GaussianRandomReadBenchmark
> >>> fails sometimes.
> >>>    [HBASE-10555] - Backport HBASE-8519 to 0.94, Backup master will
> never
> >>> come up if primary master dies during initialization
> >>>    [HBASE-10562] - Fix TestMultiTableInputFormat for Hadoop 2 in 0.94
> >>>    [HBASE-10212] - New rpc metric: number of active handler
> >>>    [HBASE-10423] - Report back the message of split or rollback failure
> >>> to the master
> >>>    [HBASE-10457] - Print corrupted file information in SnapshotInfo
> tool
> >>> without -file option
> >>>    [HBASE-10473] - Add utility for adorning http Context
> >>>    [HBASE-10480] - TestLogRollPeriod#testWithEdits may fail due to
> >>> insufficient waiting
> >>>
> >>> Notable in this release is HBASE-10501, which changes how regions are
> >>> distributed for an initially empty table.
> >>>
> >>> The list of changes is also available here:
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12325845
> >>>
> >>> Here're the jenkins runs for this RC:
> >>> https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-0.94.17/15/ and
> >>> https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-0.94.17-security/5/
> >>>
> >>> Please try out the RC, check out the doc, take it for a spin, etc, and
> >>> vote +1/-1 by EOD February 24th on whether we should release this as
> >>> 0.94.17.
> >>>
> >>> As before, I realize that release testing is like pulling teeth, but
> >>> please give this is quick run, so we can get these bug fixes out there.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks.
> >>>
> >>> -- Lars
> >>
>

Reply via email to