On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 11:44 AM, lars hofhansl <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yeah. Sorry. That's not good. I usually make sure that does not happen, > but I missed that one. > > I don't know what to do about issues like this. The RM's can't possibly > watch all issues. Another area where I find this a lot is with bug fixes > that are committed to 0.96 or 0.98 and later, but the committer forgets > about 0.94. I try to catch all these things, but some will slip. > > So here's a renewed call to all committers (including myself): > - There should never be a feature gap (i.e. a feature in 0.94, not in > 0.96, but then again 0.98). All committers should check for that. > - Bugfixes should always be considered as to whether they'd useful for > earlier releases. Unless the area of code is new the likely answer is yes. > Amen. St.Ack
