Downloaded the src, compiled it.  Verified the signatures also.
Ran IT tests along with restart scenarios with V3 version and ACL CP and
Visibility CP enabled.  Even restart scenarios look fine.
+1 on RC.

REgards
Ram


On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 6:04 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> wrote:

> I ran the unit test suite 25 times on JDK 7 and did not see this. I am
> currently doing the same on JDK 6. No unit test failures so far.
>
>
> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
> jean-m...@spaggiari.org> wrote:
>
> > I tried the test suite 3 times and 3 times failed on this:
> > Results :
> >
> > Failed tests:
> >
> >
> testCacheOnWriteEvictOnClose(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestStoreFile)
> >
> > Tests in error:
> >
> >
> >
> testScannerSelection[0](org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.TestScannerSelectionUsingKeyRange)
> >
> >
> >
> testScannerSelection[1](org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.TestScannerSelectionUsingKeyRange)
> >
> >
> >
> testScannerSelection[2](org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.TestScannerSelectionUsingKeyRange)
> >
> >
> >
> testBlocksScannedWithEncoding(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestBlocksScanned)
> >
> testBlocksScanned(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestBlocksScanned)
> >
> >
> >
> testWholesomeSplit(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestSplitTransaction)
> >
> > Tests run: 840, Failures: 1, Errors: 6, Skipped: 2
> >
> >
> > Am I the only one facing that?
> >
> > JM
> >
> >
> > 2014-05-27 14:27 GMT-04:00 Jesse Yates <jesse.k.ya...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > > Downloaded, checked signature, poked around with a mini-cluster +
> shell,
> > ui
> > > looks good, built against phoenix.
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > -------------------
> > > Jesse Yates
> > > @jesse_yates
> > > jyates.github.com
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 10:09 AM, Anoop John <anoop.hb...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > > Downloaded, checked signature, ran tests, checked doc.  Ran ITs for
> > > > visibility labels, tags and encryption (HFile and WAL). All looks
> good.
> > > >
> > > > -Anoop-
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 10:20 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > Downloaded, checked hash, checked doc.
> > > > >
> > > > > Loaded data into standaalone mode.  Checked it made it.  Checked
> UI.
> > >  All
> > > > > seems fine.
> > > > >
> > > > > Put it up on my little test cluster and ran my blockcache loadings
> (I
> > > had
> > > > > to copy in hadoop 2.4.x libs).  It started fine over data written
> by
> > > > trunk.
> > > > >  Seems fine.  No unusual behaviors that I could see on cursory
> > review.
> > > > >
> > > > > St.Ack
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Andrew Purtell <
> apurt...@apache.org
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > The 2nd HBase 0.98.3 release candidate (RC1) is available for
> > > download
> > > > at
> > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.3RC1/ and Maven
> artifacts
> > > are
> > > > > also
> > > > > > available in the temporary repository
> > > > > >
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1022
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The issues resolved in this release can be found here:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12326765
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific
> > Time
> > > > > (00:00
> > > > > > -0800 GMT) on June 1 on whether or not we should release this as
> > > > 0.98.3.
> > > > > > Three +1 votes from PMC will be required to release.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > >
> > > > > >    - Andy
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. -
> Piet
> > > > Hein
> > > > > > (via Tom White)
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
>    - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>

Reply via email to