Er, I mean no user should be running on a runtime less than 7, they are all EOL...
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:28 AM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 9:15 AM, Nicolas Liochon <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Should we be 1.7 only for trunk / 1.0? >> This would mean using the 1.7 features. >> > > I think this is prudent. Hadoop common is having a similar discussion and > I think converging on consensus that they would be ok with their trunk > including features only available in 7. > > >> What about .98? >> > > I don't think this is an option, because although no user should be > running with a 7 runtime (and in fact performance conscious users should be > looking hard at 8), vendors will still have to support customers on 6. > > -- > Best regards, > > - Andy > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein > (via Tom White) > -- Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)
