Also, #incrementColumnValue seems like it's "tacked on". It appears to be a subset of functionality provided by #increment. Why do we provide this interface but not an equivalent #appendColumnValue ?
Rename #mutateRow to just #mutate ? This would make mutate/checkAndMutate consistent with put/checkAndPut and delete/checkAndDelete. Do we want to drop the @deprecated methods from this interface as well, or is that put off for 2.0 ? On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Nick Dimiduk <ndimi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Heya, > > Do we want to change this method name in the new Table interface to just > setAutoFlush? Will this be confusing for folks migrating from the > HTableInterface methods? > > Would be good to make a decision on this (and any other Client API > changes) before 1.0. > > -n >
