We're good for a new RC. This vote is canceled. On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 8:47 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> wrote: > > We have one new failing test on branch-1 and master, TestFastFail, in > failed builds with only HBASE-12348 in common. HBASE-12348 only changes > AccessController and TestAccessController. I looked at TestFastFail and > don't see how an AccessController only change can affect it, there are no > security coprocessors installed for that test (not that I expected any). > Anyway, since those builds HBASE-12696 has been committed to branch-1 and > master so I'll wait to see the build reports for those branches > on HBASE-12696 before proceeding. > > > On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 6:37 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> > wrote: >> >> I have pushed HBASE-12686 to 0.98. There was also a branch-1 patch so >> that went in too. Local tests had a mixed result. TestSplitLogManager is >> flaky for me on branch-1, but always passes when run on its own, and this >> happens with or without the 12686 change. I'm going to wait to see how the >> branch-1 Jenkins builds look before proceeding with a new 0.98 RC, in case >> a revert is necessary. Should be just a few more hours. >> >> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> >> wrote: >>> >>> If we can get a patch with a consensus "ok" by the end of today I'll >>> restart the 0.98.9 RC, otherwise let's put it in .10. It's not a regression >>> in 0.98.9, but a problem also in earlier releases. >>> >>> On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 10:42 PM, rajesh babu Chintaguntla < >>> chrajeshbab...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I think Vandana already had working patch it seems. I think she will >>>> upload >>>> patch today. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Rajeshbabu. >>>> >>>> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Andrew Purtell < >>>> andrew.purt...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > My thought is if we have a fix in a day or so a new RC would be good. >>>> > Otherwise we don't (yet) have a veto, and can decide what to do on the >>>> > issue. >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > > On Dec 14, 2014, at 7:12 PM, lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org> >>>> wrote: >>>> > > >>>> > > Unless that is a new issue introduced in a recent 0.98 release, or >>>> can >>>> > be expected to be fixed in a day or so, >>>> > > this does not need to hold up the release IMHO. >>>> > > >>>> > > -- Lars >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > ----- Original Message ----- >>>> > > From: Andrew Purtell <andrew.purt...@gmail.com> >>>> > > To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" <dev@hbase.apache.org> >>>> > > Cc: >>>> > > Sent: Sunday, December 14, 2014 6:18 PM >>>> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] The 1st HBase 0.98.9 release candidate (RC0) is >>>> > available, vote closing 12/17/2014 >>>> > > >>>> > > Ok, I made HBASE-12686 a blocker for 0.98.9 as requested. >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > >> On Dec 14, 2014, at 4:57 PM, rajesh babu Chintaguntla < >>>> > chrajeshbab...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> > >> >>>> > >> Andrew I got HBASE-12686 in 0.98 branch. >>>> > >> It will not allow to balance any failures during split. I think we >>>> need >>>> > to >>>> > >> fix it before release. >>>> > >> What do you say? >>>> > >> >>>> > >> Thanks, >>>> > >> Rajeshbabu. >>>> > >> >>>> > >>> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 12:15 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> Compiled Phoenix master branch with dependency changed to HBase >>>> 0.98.9 >>>> > - >>>> > >>> passed >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> Cheers >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>>> On Dec 14, 2014, at 1:19 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> > >>>> >>>> > >>>> +1 >>>> > >>>> >>>> > >>>> Verified signature. >>>> > >>>> Ran through test suite against Hadoop-2 : tests passed >>>> > >>>> Performed 'mvn apache-rat:check' : passed >>>> > >>>> >>>> > >>>> Cheers >>>> > >>>> >>>> > >>>>> On Dec 11, 2014, at 1:54 PM, Andrew Purtell < >>>> apurt...@apache.org> >>>> > wrote: >>>> > >>>>> >>>> > >>>>> The 1st HBase 0.98.9 release candidate (RC0) is available >>>> for >>>> > >>> download >>>> > >>>>> at http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.9RC0/ and Maven >>>> artifacts >>>> > >>> are >>>> > >>>>> also available in the temporary repository >>>> > >>>>> >>>> > >>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1049/ >>>> > >>>>> >>>> > >>>>> Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD. >>>> > >>>>> >>>> > >>>>> The issues resolved in this release can be found here: >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12328795 >>>> > >>>>> >>>> > >>>>> Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific >>>> Time >>>> > >>> (00:00 >>>> > >>>>> -0800 GMT) on December 17 on whether or not we should >>>> release >>>> > this >>>> > >>> as >>>> > >>>>> 0.98.8. Three +1 votes from PMC will be required to release. >>>> > >>>>> >>>> > >>>>> >>>> > >>>>> -- >>>> > >>>>> Best regards, >>>> > >>>>> >>>> > >>>>> - Andy >>>> > >>>>> >>>> > >>>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - >>>> Piet >>>> > Hein >>>> > >>>>> (via Tom White) >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Best regards, >>> >>> - Andy >>> >>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein >>> (via Tom White) >>> >> >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> >> - Andy >> >> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein >> (via Tom White) >> > > > -- > Best regards, > > - Andy > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein > (via Tom White) >
-- Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)