Any chance of fixing this by way of a contribution back to the maven-skin maintainers? We can avoid bringing back the site.vm if we leave this in their hands.
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Dima Spivak <dspi...@cloudera.com> wrote: > Ooh, good call, guys. Yeah, looks like all we'd need to do is move > bootstrap.min.css and bootstrap-responsive.min.css onto our server and link > to it relatively instead of with absolute links it has now. Seeing as how > both of those CSS files are Apache License, should be easy. > > -Dima > > On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Elliott Clark <ecl...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Yeah the js and css are all loaded though a cdn. It should be pretty easy > > to change the urls to be protocol relative and then things should work. > > > > On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Enis Söztutar <enis....@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > I had the same problem. We link to CSS which is http instead of forking > > and > > > serving it in the site (I believe this is the default practice). My > > chrome > > > extension refuses to connect to http links causing rendering problems. > > > > > > Enis > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Dima Spivak <dspi...@cloudera.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Not sure if this is something to address in this thread or if I > should > > > file > > > > a separate JIRA, but for some reason, accessing the site over https > > gets > > > > rid of the pretty CSS. Seems to happen in Chrome and Firefox. Anyone > > > have a > > > > clue why? > > > > > > > > -Dima > > > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Nick Dimiduk <ndimi...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Tweaking the layout of the website goes one of two ways. Either > > > there's a > > > > > configuration point exposed from the maven skin or there isn't. If > > > there > > > > > is, it's simply editing the appropriate custom tag in site.xml. If > > not, > > > > > we'll need to bring back the velocity site.vm template. > > Configurations > > > > are > > > > > documented here: > > > > > http://andriusvelykis.github.io/reflow-maven-skin/skin/config.html > > > > > > > > > > Tweaking visuals is now based on the theme. We can either choose > > > another > > > > > bootswatch theme, or write our own. That stuff is documented here: > > > > > http://andriusvelykis.github.io/reflow-maven-skin/skin/themes/ > > > > > > > > > > Right now the site is separate from the book. In theory we could > move > > > > book > > > > > content over to become site content, in which case it would be > > managed > > > by > > > > > this same plugin. Short of that, we get into applying style via the > > > > docbook > > > > > plugin. I've looked into this a bit; it's not nearly as easy as > > > applying > > > > > reflow-maven-skin. The current leads I have for this are > > > > > https://github.com/lcahlander/docbook and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/pmartin/phing-documentation-docbook/commit/8d8f0b81951c4e07420083b204599a6b9ef00537 > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > > Honestly though, if we're looking at moving away from docbook, I > > think > > > we > > > > > should consider a more modern toolset, Sphinx-doc, for example: > > > > > http://sphinx-doc.org > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 8:21 PM, Misty Stanley-Jones < > > > > > mstanleyjo...@cloudera.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Absolutely fantastic!!! Got pointers to how tweaking the website > > > would > > > > > > work? > > > > > > > > > > > > In the new year I hope to really get started on a restructure of > > the > > > > Ref > > > > > > Guide. I've thought about asking to move to AsciiDOC or MarkDown > > but > > > > I'd > > > > > > like to do a proof-of-concept and see if it really gets us > anything > > > we > > > > > > don't already have with Docbook. It's less of a potential value > > since > > > > we > > > > > > are not hosted on Github, which has great integration with > AsciiDOC > > > and > > > > > > MarkDown. I'm very interested in improving the look and feel of > the > > > > doc. > > > > > I > > > > > > think a lot of it will be structural -- reorganizing and > > re-chunking > > > > > > content. > > > > > > > > > > > > In the meantime, theming the Docbook is not as hard as you might > > > think. > > > > > > Have a look at the XSLT files. (I know, famous last words). > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 1:21 PM, Nick Dimiduk < > ndimi...@gmail.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > For those not following closely in JIRAland, I've two changes > > that > > > > are > > > > > > > ready to go. First, there's transition over to a > bootstrap-based > > > > layout > > > > > > for > > > > > > > our home page. This work is done in HBASE-12688. This improves > > the > > > > > looks > > > > > > of > > > > > > > things and will make it pretty easy to update our look-and-feel > > in > > > > the > > > > > > > future. Second, I fixed a build problem where the online book > > > wasn't > > > > > > > getting its intended styling. This is done in HBASE-12687. I'd > > like > > > > to > > > > > > > update the book to look the same as the front-page, but getting > > > > styles > > > > > > into > > > > > > > docbook is proving non-trivial. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyway, both of these changes are pushed to master and we're > > ready > > > > for > > > > > a > > > > > > > site re-build with the new look. I'll make that happen tomorrow > > > > morning > > > > > > > unless I hear actionable objections. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You can get a preview of things to come over one > > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~ndimiduk/site/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > Nick > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks. I've been having a dialog w/ your crew that has been > > > going > > > > > on a > > > > > > > > while... was wondering if any progress. > > > > > > > > Grand, > > > > > > > > St.Ack > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 11:55 AM, Ryan Rawson < > > ryano...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm checking to see if our marketing and web team can help. > > > The > > > > > > > > > primary requirement is going to be ditching the mvn:site > from > > > the > > > > > > > > > front page. "reskinning it" might not be so easy. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -ryan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 9:52 AM, lars hofhansl < > > > la...@apache.org> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > I just came across one of the various HBase vs. Cassandra > > > > > articles, > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > one of the main tenants of the articles was how much better > > the > > > > > > > Cassandra > > > > > > > > > documentation was.Thank god we have Misty now. :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (not sure how much just a skin would help, but it surely > > > won't > > > > > > hurt) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Lars > > > > > > > > > > From: Nick Dimiduk <ndimi...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > > To: hbase-dev <dev@hbase.apache.org> > > > > > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 2, 2014 9:46 AM > > > > > > > > > > Subject: A face-lift for 1.0 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Heya, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In mind of the new release, I was thinking we should > clean > > up > > > > our > > > > > > > act a > > > > > > > > > > little bit in regard to hbase.apache.org and our book. > > Just > > > > > > because > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > project started in 2007 doesn't mean we need a site that > > > looks > > > > > like > > > > > > > > it's > > > > > > > > > > from 2007. Phoenix's site looks great in this regard. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For the home page, I was thinking of converting it over > to > > > > > > bootstrap > > > > > > > > [0] > > > > > > > > > so > > > > > > > > > > that it'll be easier to pick up theme, either on of our > own > > > or > > > > > > > > something > > > > > > > > > > pre-canned [1]. I'm no web designer, but the idea is this > > > would > > > > > > make > > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > > > easier for someone who is to help us out. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For the book, I just want to skin it -- no intention of > > > > changing > > > > > > > > docbook > > > > > > > > > > part (such a decision I'll leave up to Misty). I'm less > > sure > > > on > > > > > > this > > > > > > > > > > project, but Riak's docs are a nice inspiration. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What do you think? Do we know any web designers who can > > help > > > > out > > > > > > with > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > CSS? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -n > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [0]: http://getbootstrap.com > > > > > > > > > > [1]: https://wrapbootstrap.com/ > > > > > > > > > > [2]: http://docs.basho.com/riak/latest/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
