[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10528?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Andrew Purtell reopened HBASE-10528:
------------------------------------

Reopened since we had some reverts. Let's fix the failing test and get this 
back in. 

> DefaultBalancer selects plans to move regions onto draining nodes
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-10528
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10528
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 0.94.5
>            Reporter: churro morales
>            Assignee: churro morales
>             Fix For: 1.0.0, 2.0.0, 1.1.0
>
>         Attachments: 10528-1.0.addendum, HBASE-10528-0.94.patch, 
> HBASE-10528-0.98.patch, HBASE-10528.patch, HBASE-10528.v2.patch
>
>
> We have quite a large cluster > 100k regions, and we needed to isolate a 
> region was very hot until we could push a patch.  We put this region on its 
> own regionserver and set it in the draining state.  The default balancer was 
> selecting regions to move to this cluster for its region plans.  
> It just so happened for other tables, the default load balancer was creating 
> plans for the draining servers, even though they were not available to move 
> regions to.  Thus we were closing regions, then attempting to move them to 
> the draining server then finding out its draining. 
> We had to disable the balancer to resolve this issue.
> There are some approaches we can take here.
> 1. Exclude draining servers altogether, don't even pass those into the load 
> balancer from HMaster.
> 2. We could exclude draining servers from ceiling and floor calculations 
> where we could potentially skip load balancing because those draining servers 
> wont be represented when deciding whether to balance.
> 3. Along with #2 when assigning regions, we would skip plans to assign 
> regions to those draining servers.
> I am in favor of #1 which is simply removes servers as candidates for 
> balancing if they are in the draining state.
> But I would love to hear what everyone else thinks.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to