I'm in the middle of verifying the RC, but I'm inclined agree with Lars due to the severity of the issue and the fact that folks would need to wait ~a month.
Unless we pushed ahead and then did a shortened vote for 0.98.10.1? -- Sean On Jan 31, 2015 8:00 PM, "lars hofhansl" <la...@apache.org> wrote: > I think we should sink this and include HBASE-12782, followed by a > shortened voting cycle. > -- Lars > > From: Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> > To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" <dev@hbase.apache.org> > Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 10:43 PM > Subject: [VOTE] The 2nd HBase 0.98.10 release candidate (RC1) is > available, vote closing 2/3/2015 > > The 2nd HBase 0.98.10 release candidate (RC1) is available for > download at http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.10RC1/ and Maven > artifacts are also available in the temporary repository > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1059/ > > Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD. > > The issues resolved in this release can be found at > http://s.apache.org/7hO > > Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time (00:00 > -0800 GMT) on February 3 on whether or not we should release this as > 0.98.10. Three +1 votes from PMC will be required to release. > > > -- > Best regards, > > - Andy > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein > (via Tom White) > >
