Enis Soztutar created HBASE-13260:
-------------------------------------

             Summary: Bootstrap Tables for fun and profit 
                 Key: HBASE-13260
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13260
             Project: HBase
          Issue Type: Bug
            Reporter: Enis Soztutar
            Assignee: Enis Soztutar
             Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.1.0


Over at the ProcV2 discussions(HBASE-12439) and elsewhere I was mentioning an 
idea where we may want to use regular old regions to store/persist some data 
needed for HBase master to operate. 

We regularly use system tables for storing system data. acl, meta, namespace, 
quota are some examples. We also store the table state in meta now. Some data 
is persisted in zk only (replication peers and replication state, etc). We are 
moving away from zk as a permanent storage. As any self-respecting database 
does, we should store almost all of our data in HBase itself. 

However, we have an "availability" dependency between different kinds of data. 
For example all system tables need meta to be assigned first. All master 
operations need ns table to be assigned, etc. 

For at least two types of data, (1) procedure v2 states, (2) RS groups in 
HBASE-6721 we cannot depend on meta being assigned since "assignment" itself 
will depend on accessing this data. The solution in (1) is to implement a 
custom WAL format, and custom recover lease and WAL recovery. The solution in 
(2) is to have the table to store this data, but also cache it in zk for 
bootrapping initial assignments. 

For solving both of the above (and possible future use cases if any), I propose 
we add a "boostrap table" concept, which is: 
 - A set of predefined tables hosted in a separate dir in HDFS. 
 - A table is only 1 region, not splittable 
 - Not assigned through regular assignment 
 - Hosted only on 1 server (typically master)
 - Has a dedicated WAL. 
 - A service does WAL recovery + fencing for these tables. 

This has the benefit of using a region to keep the data, but frees us to 
re-implement caching and we can use the same WAL / Memstore / Recovery 
mechanisms that are battle-tested. 



 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to