Should we wait for HBASE-13262 to be in before this RC? Seems as though the change that is currently in the works would not require backporting HBASE-11544 and thus could be backported into 0.98 and branch-1.0 as well. If waiting for it to be in is not appropriate due to the need to get on top of the issue right away, I understand, just a thought.
Jonathan On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> wrote: > Thanks. Coming tonight, then > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 2:52 AM, Anoop John <anoop.hb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 for making new RC > > > > -Anoop- > > > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 5:52 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > Any further comment or concerns on HBASE-13303 beforehand? It is an > ugly > > > hack I hope to revert after we have a better fix, see tail of > > HBASE-11544, > > > but it or something like it is needed to prevent issues with scanning > > under > > > certain configuration settings should cells carry tags. > > > > > > -- > > > Best regards, > > > > > > - Andy > > > > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet > Hein > > > (via Tom White) > > > > > > > > > -- > Best regards, > > - Andy > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein > (via Tom White) >
