In DisableTableHandler#handleDisableTable(), we do the following: (1). Set the table state to DISABLING (2). Try to mark all regions of table (based on in-memory state of the active master) to offline (3). If 2 succeed, then set the table state to DISABLED
My question is if (2) failed, it would continue to co-processor post operation and complete the process() call. This will leave the table in DISABLING state without letting user know that the operation actually fails. Is this desired behavior? Thanks Stephen
