On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 8:20 AM, Sean Busbey <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 6:54 AM, Lars Francke <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Thanks Lars. Any other opinions, any more input? > > > > If not I hope to have some time this week to work on these points: > > > > * In the master branch (which will be released as 2.0.0 if I'm not > > mistaken) remove (or undeprecate if it turns out the functionality is > > actually still needed) all functionality that was marked deprecated prior > > to 1.0.0 > > * Clarify that all deprecations that were added in 1.x will be removed in > > 3.0.0 (using JavaDoc and in the book) > > * Clarify that all deprecations that were added in 2.x will be removed in > > 4.0.0 (using JavaDoc and in the book) > > * Clarify the SemVer documentation with a different example > > > > I'd rather not do unnecessary or unwanted work :) > > > > > > FWIW, this works for me. The lack of complaints leads me to believe it > works for other PMCs. ;) > > Works for me (though quiet, have been following closely -- as are others I'd think). > Please make sure these removals have good release notes. Folks who know > what their API usage looks like should have a heads up prior to > recompiling. (I'm happy to help iterate on release notes once you get to > that point.) > > Good idea (umbrella issue to tie the efforts together). Thanks LarsF, St.Ack
