The vote has passed with 3 binding and 1 non-binding +1's and one -0. I'll push the release artifacts shortly.
Thanks for testing the release! Enis On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 > > Checked signatures > Unpacked tarballs, layout looks good > Built from source > RAT check passed > Checked docs. Minor issue with logo asset not loading, not critical. > Started single node cluster and ran LTT of 1M keys, no unusual or > unexpected warnings or errors, reported latencies were stable after warmup > > > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Enis Söztutar <e...@apache.org> wrote: > >> UT run for this RC is at >> https://builds.apache.org/view/All/job/HBase-1.0.1RC2/4/. Previous runs >> had >> some flaky failures. >> >> Kind reminder that the RC vote has been extended until tonight since we >> did >> not get enough votes. Please spend some time for the RC if you can. >> >> Thanks. >> Enis >> >> On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 9:46 PM, Enis Söztutar <e...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> > Here is my +1 for the RC. >> > >> > Checked sigs, crcs, >> > Checked layout, jars >> > Checked the book >> > Run local mode >> > Run on a 5 node cluster >> > Run smoke test, simple shell commands >> > Run LTT with 1M and different encodings / compression >> > Run ITBLL, wrote 100M nodes >> > Test with 1.0.0 and 0.98.12 clients >> > >> > Thanks Ted and Josh for testing the RC. We need one more +1. Anybody >> else >> > wants to test? I'll extend the vote until tomorrow midnight PDT. >> > >> > Enis >> > >> > >> > On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 9:16 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> >> > wrote: >> > >> >> +1 for resuming the vote. >> >> >> >> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 9:47 PM, Enis Söztutar <e...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> > Yes, consider voting resumed. >> >> > Andrew, is +1 for the RC or for resuming voting? >> >> > >> >> > Let me extend the VOTE until Sunday 11:59PM PDT for lost time. >> >> > >> >> > Enis >> >> > >> >> > On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org >> > >> >> > wrote: >> >> > >> >> > > +1 >> >> > > >> >> > > On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: >> >> > > >> >> > > > Can this VOTE thread come back to life now? >> >> > > > St.Ack >> >> > > > >> >> > > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Enis Söztutar < >> enis....@gmail.com >> >> > >> >> > > > wrote: >> >> > > > >> >> > > > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Andrew Purtell < >> >> > apurt...@apache.org> >> >> > > > > wrote: >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > Let's postpone this vote. >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > Agreed. >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > See the threads on dev@ titled "Clarifying interface >> evolution >> >> > > > freedom >> >> > > > > in >> >> > > > > > patch releases" and "The Renumbering (proposed)". >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Sean Busbey < >> >> bus...@cloudera.com> >> >> > > > > wrote: >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > On Apr 22, 2015 4:40 PM, "Enis Söztutar" < >> enis....@gmail.com> >> >> > > wrote: >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > I think the agreement is to continue with the RC. >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > One note... in the japi report, I was a little >> surprised >> >> > when I >> >> > > > > > noticed >> >> > > > > > > > method additions to InterfaceAudience.Public annotated >> >> classes. >> >> > > > This >> >> > > > > > > means >> >> > > > > > > > that a user could write code against 1.0.1 that would not >> >> work >> >> > > > > against >> >> > > > > > > > 1.0.0 which seems undesirable for a bugfix release. I >> read >> >> over >> >> > > the >> >> > > > > > book >> >> > > > > > > > section on compatibility and didn't see this addressed, >> so I >> >> > > > thought >> >> > > > > > I'd >> >> > > > > > > > ask. >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > I think this is allowed. Did not check it though. >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > Enis >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > It's not allowed normally under semver. There's already >> >> another >> >> > > > thread >> >> > > > > > > going on this though. >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > >> >> >> > >> > >> > > > > -- > Best regards, > > - Andy > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein > (via Tom White) >