I guess you should mention that the RC is created from branch-1.1.0, as opposed to branch-1.1.
I was looking at https://people.apache.org/~ndimiduk/1.0.0_1.1.0RC1_compat_report.html and was surprised by the HTable warning about RegionLocator. Did you cherry-pick the commit from master or branch-1.1 for branch-1.1.0? It seems that it is missing the HTable change (which is not needed in master). Enis On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 11:15 PM, Nick Dimiduk <[email protected]> wrote: > Here's my review and +1: > > [✓] verified tarballs vs public key in p.a.o/keys/committers/ndimiduk.asc. > [✓] extracted src tgz, structure looks good. > [✓] verified build of src tgz against hadoop versions (2.2.0/minikdc=2.3.0, > 2.3.0, 2.4.0, 2.4.1, 2.5.0, 2.5.1, 2.5.2, 2.6.0, 2.7.0), with both > jdk1.7.0_67.jdk (mac) and jdk1.8.0_20.jdk (mac). > [✓] run LoadTestTool against standalone built from src tgz with FAST_DIFF > block encoder and ROWCOL blooms. No issues, logs look good. > [✓] poked around with the shell on the same: list, status, snapshot, > compact, drop, clone, delete_snapshot, drop. no issues, logs look good. > [✓] built site from src tgz. site and book looks good. > [✓] extracted bin tgz, inspect structure. look good. > [✓] started standalone from bin tgz, poked webUI, dumped metrics, conf, > "debug". looks good. > [✓] load the site from bin tgz. noticed issue with non-relative link, filed > HBASE-13669. > [✓] ran Stack's hbase-downstreamer [0] vs. the maven repo. tests pass. > [✓] inspected compatibility reports vs. 0.98.0 [1] (skimmed) and 1.0.0 [2] > (thoroughly, comment on HBASE-13661). Looks okay to me. > > Additionally, against RC0 I did the following: > > [✓] on 7-node cluster, verified rolling upgrade from 0.98.0 while > concurrently running LoadTestTool with LZ4 compression (0.98.0 client). No > issues, logs look good. > [✓] run IntegrationTestBigLinkedList with slow deterministic CM on 6-node > cluster for 24+ hours, 15 loops of 75mm. All chains verified. > > [0]: https://github.com/ndimiduk/hbase-downstreamer > [1]: http://people.apache.org/~ndimiduk/0.98.0_1.1.0RC1_compat_report.html > [2]: http://people.apache.org/~ndimiduk/1.0.0_1.1.0RC1_compat_report.html > > > On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Nick Dimiduk <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I'm happy to announce the second release candidate of HBase 1.1.0 > > (HBase-1.1.0RC1) is available for download at > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-1.1.0RC1/ > > > > Maven artifacts are also available in the staging repository > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1077 > > > > Artifacts are signed with my code signing subkey 0xAD9039071C3489BD, > > available in the Apache keys directory > > https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/ndimiduk.asc. > > > > There's also a signed tag for this release at > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=hbase.git;a=tag;h=9d54a2e8806dc2a283859382e2a2069a8e49ee81 > > > > HBase 1.1.0 is the first minor release in the HBase 1.x line, continuing > > on the theme of bringing a stable, reliable database to the Hadoop and > > NoSQL communities. This release includes nearly 200 resolved issues above > > the 1.0.x series to date. Notable features include: > > > > - Async RPC client (HBASE-12684) > > - Simple RPC throttling (HBASE-11598) > > - Improved compaction controls (HBASE-8329, HBASE-12859) > > - Scan improvements (HBASE-11544, HBASE-13090) > > - New extension interfaces for coprocessor users, better supporting > > projects like Phoenix (HBASE-12972, HBASE-12975) > > - Per-column family flush (HBASE-10201) > > - WAL on SSD (HBASE-12848) > > - BlockCache in Memcached (HBASE-13170) > > - Tons of region replica enhancements around META, WAL, and bulk loading > > (HBASE-11574, HBASE-11568, HBASE-11571, HBASE-11567) > > > > The full list of issues can be found at > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12329043 > > > > This release candidate is not materially different from the previous, > > including only three changes over the previous RC: HBASE-13661, > > HBASE-13637, HBASE-13665. Because of the small difference between this RC > > and the previous, and the extended period for which the previous RC was > > available, this vote window will be open for a modest period of 48 hours. > > > > Please try out this candidate and vote +/-1 by 23:00 Pacific time on > > 2015-05-13 as to whether we should release these bits as HBase 1.1.0. > > > > Thanks, > > Nick > > >
