Comments inline On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote:
> w.r.t. hbck, the two actions listed below look good. > > Cheers > > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Jonathan Hsieh <j...@cloudera.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 7:38 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > This is a useful feature, Jon. > > > > > > I went over the mega-patch and left some comments on review board. > > > > > > I noticed that hbck was not included in the patch. Neither did I find a > > > sub-task of HBASE-11339 that covers hbck. > > > > > > Do you or Jingcheng plan to add MOB-aware capability for hbck ? > > > > > > Ted -- what in particular are you thinking about for a mob-aware hbck? > > > > here are a few things I can think of: > > > > - hbck doesn't berak mob > hbck not getting broken by mob should be a check we do and will be done before merge. > - a full table scan job that verifies all mob refs have values > > > I don't think this is a hard requirement for merge. wdyt ted? > > -- > > // Jonathan Hsieh (shay) > > // HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera > > // j...@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh > > > -- // Jonathan Hsieh (shay) // HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera // j...@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh
