Thanks Ted. > HBASE-13854 TestTableLockManager#testLockTimeoutException fails in 0.98 and 1.0 branches
Sigh, I will have to kill this RC because I can't let one out with a unit test failure I can reproduce. Let me make a new RC tomorrow and restart the vote. On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 6:57 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > checked signatures > ran unit test and discovered: > HBASE-13854 TestTableLockManager#testLockTimeoutException fails in 0.98 > and 1.0 branches > which is test issue. I marked Fix Version as 0.98.14 > > exercised basic shell commands. > > Cheers > > On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 6:01 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > The 2nd HBase 0.98.13 release candidate (RC1) is available for download > at > > http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.13RC1/ and Maven artifacts are > > also > > available in the temporary repository > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1083/ > . > > > > The API compatibility report with respect to the previous release can be > > found at > > http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.12_0.98.13RC1_compat_report.html > . > > There are 0 reported binary or source compatibility issues. > > > > Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD. > > > > The issues resolved in this release can be found at > > http://s.apache.org/F70 > > . > > > > Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time on > > June 10 on whether or not we should release this as 0.98.13. Three +1 > > votes from PMC will be required to release. > > > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > > > - Andy > > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein > > (via Tom White) > > > -- Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)