> Although the git commit matches, the checksum does not. Is this an artifact our of build process (like opening the jars and re-packaging them?
I don't think so. I checked the 0.98.14RC, which is built in a pretty similar way, and the Hadoop version is the default as you'd expect: 2.2.0, r1529768, compiled 2013-10-07T06:28Z, hortonmu On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 7:43 PM, Enis Söztutar <[email protected]> wrote: > Here is my tests so far: > > Checked sigs, crcs, > Checked files, layout and jars, > Built with Hadoop-2.3+ > Cheked compat report > Run local mode and simple smoke tests from shell > Build with hbase-downstreamer > Inspected logs, nothing out of ordinary > Inspected the UI. > > One curious question though. The hadoop version reported is different than > the "released" artifacts and shows you as the compiler. Although the git > commit matches, the checksum does not. Is this an artifact our of build > process (like opening the jars and re-packaging them?) How do we know that > we do not alter the hadoop libs. > > Here is version info for 1.1.2RC2 > > Version Info: > =========================================================== > HBase 1.1.2 > Source code repository > git://hw11397.local/Volumes/hbase-1.1.2RC1/hbase > revision=cc2b70cf03e3378800661ec5cab11eb43fafe0fc > Compiled by ndimiduk on Fri Aug 21 17:03:33 PDT 2015 > From source with checksum 73da41f3d1b867b7aba6166c77fafc17 > Hadoop 2.5.1 > Source code repository Unknown > revision=2e18d179e4a8065b6a9f29cf2de9451891265cce > Compiled by ndimiduk on 2015-03-26T16:58Z > > > Versus 1.0.2RC: > > Version Info: > =========================================================== > HBase 1.0.2 > Source code repository > git://HW10676.local/Users/enis/projects/git-repos/hbase > revision=76745a2cbffe08b812be16e0e19e637a23a923c5 > Compiled by enis on Tue Aug 25 15:59:49 PDT 2015 > From source with checksum 0bddb2fdbd66bdb14c0742f71c680f16 > Hadoop 2.5.1 > Source code repository Unknown > revision=2e18d179e4a8065b6a9f29cf2de9451891265cce > Compiled by kasha on 2014-09-05T23:05Z > > > The checksums for the jar files in the lib dir for the binary artifacts > also do not match. > > Enis > > > On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 5:51 PM, Nick Dimiduk <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hello Devs! > > > > I'm happy to announce the second release candidate of HBase 1.1.2 > > (HBase-1.1.2RC1) is available for download at > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-1.1.2RC1/ > > > > Maven artifacts are also available in the staging repository > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1093 > > > > Artifacts are signed with my code signing subkey 0xAD9039071C3489BD, > > available in the Apache keys directory > > https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/ndimiduk.asc > > > > There's also a signed tag for this release at > > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=hbase.git;a=tag;h=8ee7a8114fbdae83c979165166b3357a3c44844a > > > > The detailed source and binary compatibility report vs 1.1.0 has been > > published for your review, at > > http://people.apache.org/~ndimiduk/1.1.0_1.1.2RC1_compat_report.html > > > > HBase 1.1.2 is the second patch release in the HBase 1.1 line, continuing > > on the theme of bringing a stable, reliable database to the Hadoop and > > NoSQL communities. This release includes over 80 bug fixes since the > 1.1.1 > > release. Notable correctness fixes include HBASE-14054, HBASE-12865, > > HBASE-13993, HBASE-13337, HBASE-14013, HBASE-13895. > > > > This release candidate includes 16 commits over the RC0 tag. The full > list > > of changes since RC0 can be inspected with git log --format=oneline > > 1.1.2RC0..1.1.2RC1 or on git-web: > > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=hbase.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/branch-1.1 > > > > The full list of fixes included in this release is available at > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12332793 > > and in the CHANGES.txt file included in the distribution. > > > > Please try out this candidate and vote +/-1 by Wednesday, 2015-08-26 > 23:59 > > UTC-07:00 as to whether we should release these artifacts as HBase 1.1.2. > > > > Thanks, > > Nick > > > -- Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)
