+1 based on the following: verified signatures ran unit test suite - pass loaded onto a small cluster and performed sanity checks (hbase shell, UI, etc)
Cheers On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 9:16 PM, Nick Dimiduk <ndimi...@apache.org> wrote: > Hello again devs, > > This "third time's the charm" edition release candidate of HBase 1.1.2 > (HBase-1.1.2RC2) is available for download at > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-1.1.2RC2/ > > Maven artifacts are also available in the staging repository > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1115/ > > Artifacts are signed with my code signing subkey 0xAD9039071C3489BD, > available in the Apache keys directory > https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/ndimiduk.asc and in our project > KEYS files at https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/hbase/KEYS > > There's a signed tag for this release at > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=hbase.git;a=tag;h=b54078ddc30b9feb09aa36f3cf9fa8af757fa77b > > The detailed source and binary compatibility report vs 1.1.0 has been > published for your review, at > http://people.apache.org/~ndimiduk/1.1.0_1.1.2RC2_compat_report.html > > HBase 1.1.2 is the second patch release in the HBase 1.1 line, continuing > on the theme of bringing a stable, reliable database to the Hadoop and > NoSQL communities. This release includes over 80 bug fixes since the 1.1.1 > release. Notable correctness fixes include HBASE-14054, HBASE-12865, > HBASE-13993, HBASE-13337, HBASE-14013, HBASE-13895. > > This release candidate is identical to the RC1 tag. The only difference is > it was built with the updated make_rc.sh script attached to HBASE-14318. > > The full list of fixes included in this release is available at > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12332793 > and in the CHANGES.txt file included in the distribution. > > Please try out this candidate and vote +/-1 by Monday, 2015-08-31 23:59 > UTC-07:00 as to whether we should release these artifacts as HBase 1.1.2. > > Thanks, > Nick >
