I like them both Misty. Sounds like [0] Fluido will be easier to maintain going forward. Lets go with it. I can mess with the search np.
St.Ack On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Misty Stanley-Jones < [email protected]> wrote: > Ok I've got the Fluido version [0] looking pretty good in mobile and normal > browsers now. Opinions appreciated. > > On Oct 29, 2015, at 4:51 PM, Misty Stanley-Jones < > [email protected]> > wrote: > > I know how to take off the Fork on Github ribbon and have done so. :) > > The two links below use two different Maven site skins. [0] uses Fluido, > from Apache. [1] uses the same Reflow skin we are already using, with some > CSS and Javascript tweaks, and some tweaks to the source files for the > site. > > I've learned some nifty tricks along the way, which is good all the way > around. > > [0] has the site search, which is rather nice, but I have no idea how to > modify it to use the Hadoop search site that Stack lines instead of Google. > I have zero clue how to get a site search in [1] at all. > > I've re-staged [0] with a few tweaks to hopefully make it more > mobile-friendly. I do agree that it is a cleaner look overall. However, it > is not based on Bootstrap (I believe). Apparently a version 2.0 is in the > works which may bring more responsive design. > > I've just re-staged [1] without the per-page navigation menus because the > Bootstrap affix code was too tricky to get right, and none of our site > pages are really long enough to need a page-specific menu. I've also > switched the font back from Oxygen (Google Fonts) to Helvetica Neue, which > is what [0] is using as well. > > It seems to take some time (30-60 minutes) for Github to rebuild the pages, > so perhaps give it some time before clicking. I think I have time zones on > my side and it won't be a problem. > > [0]: http://mstanleyjones.github.io/hbase/index.html > > [1]: http://mstanleyjones.github.io/hbase/reflow_update/index.html > > > > Of course I've kept the changes needed for each version on different > branches and if we like either of them better than what we currently have, > I will put up a patch for review. >
