Yeah, let's finish that.
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: > See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14172 > > On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Josh Elser <josh.el...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > In looking at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14800, I saw > > that the current libthrift dependency on master was at 0.9.2, but the > > generated code still has the 0.9.0 comments. > > > > Is there a reason for that? Should the libthrift version defined in the > > poms be the de-facto version used by that version of HBase? > > > > Thanks. > > > > - Josh > > > -- Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)
