Elliot what (approximate) HBase version has that been with? 1.0? On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 11:48 AM, Elliott Clark <ecl...@apache.org> wrote:
> We've been running a version of 2.6.X for a while and it's been quite > stable for us. I would be +1 for supporting 2.6.1+ > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 8:58 AM, Nick Dimiduk <ndimi...@apache.org> wrote: > > > I've verified compilation at least of 1.1.x on 2.6 releases. I'm fine > with > > upgrading "X" to "NT" for this combination. > > > > While we're in there, we should also clarify the meaning of "Not > Supported" > > vs "Not Tested". It seems we don't say what we mean by these > distinctions. > > > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 7:15 AM, Sean Busbey <bus...@cloudera.com> > wrote: > > > > > Heya folks, > > > > > > In response to our push the Hadoop community has been making patch > > releases > > > on the 2.6 and 2.7 line. So far on 2.6 they've gotten out 2, with the > > first > > > containing fixes for all of the critical issues that led to us marking > > > 2.6.0 as a no-no[1]. > > > > > > Any opposition to adding in a line for 2.6.1+ similar to the 2.7.1+ > line? > > > Thoughts on which versions of HBase it should apply to? > > > > > > [1]: http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hadoop > > > > > > -- > > > Sean > > > > > > -- Sean
