What is the specific compatibility issue? By default the tool will only look at classes we annotate as Public or LimitedPrivate. Maybe that's why some changes you are expecting to be called out are not present in the report?
> On Nov 15, 2015, at 3:07 PM, Nick Dimiduk <ndimi...@apache.org> wrote: > > For my part, my vote is +0, pending review of compatibility report. My vote > is +1 assuming we can get a clean report. > > - download tarballs, verified signatures vs below ndimiduk.asc and KEYS > file in dist repo > - verified none of rej, orig, java, or scala files in the bin tgz > - verified none of rej, orig, class, jar files in the src tgz > - inspected site and docs in bin tgz, looks good > - build from source vs all combinations of openjdk-1.7.0_79, > openjdk-1.8.0_45, and hadoop versions 2.2.0, 2.3.0, 2.4.0, 2.4.1, 2.5.0, > 2.5.1, 2.5.2, 2.6.0, 2.6.1, 2.6.2, 2.7.0, 2.7.1 > - ran in local mode with LoadTestTool, FAST_DIFF, 1mm rows; passed. I > noticed client connection log entries in the master .out file. I've never > noticed this; it was unexpected but not harmful. > - inspected linked compatibility report. I'm not convinced it is working > properly as even the acknowledged changes we observed in 1.1.2 [0] are not > reported. Thoughts Sean? > - ran stack's hbase-downstreamer [0] project `mvn clean package` vs staging > maven repo. Tests pass. > - ran Dmitry's shaded-client downstreamer project [1] vs staging maven repo > and bin tarball, versions adjusted for the release candidate. Test app runs > successfully. > > Thanks, > Nick > > [0]: https://github.com/saintstack/hbase-downstreamer > [1]: https://github.com/dminkovsky/HBASE-13889 > >> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 10:58 PM, Nick Dimiduk <ndimi...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> Thank you Josh for taking time to evaluate this release candidate. A >> reminder to others that the voting period is scheduled to expire in roughly >> 24 hours. I myself have not had time this week to evaluate this candidate >> properly, so I would like to extend the voting period through the weekend. >> If there are no objections I will tally the vote at 23:59 on Sunday, >> November 15, Pacific time. >> >> Thanks, >> Nick >> >> >>> On Tuesday, November 10, 2015, Josh Elser <josh.el...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> * Built from source >>> * Ran tests (-PrunDevTests). o.a.h.h.r.TestRegionServerHostname was >>> problematic, might have just been me. >>> * Checked sigs/xsums >>> * Checked the compat report (thanks for posting it, Nick) >>> * Skimmed release notes looking for anything that might introduce new >>> deps for licensing concerns (found none) >>> >>> Nick Dimiduk wrote: >>> >>>> I'm happy to announce the first release candidate of HBase 1.1.3 >>>> (HBase-1.1. >>>> 3RC0) is available for download at >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-1.1.3RC0/ >>>> >>>> Maven artifacts are also available in the staging repository >>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1117 >>>> >>>> Artifacts are signed with my code signing subkey 0xAD9039071C3489BD, >>>> available in the Apache keys directory >>>> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/ndimiduk.asc >>>> >>>> There's also a signed tag for this release at >>>> >>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=hbase.git;a=tag;h=16e905679e2dd5cb1b05ca8bc34a403e154a395f >>>> >>>> The detailed source and binary compatibility report vs 1.1.0 has been >>>> published for your review, at >>>> http://people.apache.org/~ndimiduk/1.1.0_1.1.3RC0_compat_report.html >>>> >>>> HBase 1.1.3 is the third patch release in the HBase 1.1 line, continuing >>>> on >>>> the theme of bringing a stable, reliable database to the Hadoop and NoSQL >>>> communities. This release includes over 120 bug fixes since the 1.1.2 >>>> release. Notable correctness fixes >>>> include HBASE-14474, HBASE-14591, HBASE-14224, >>>> HBASE-14431, HBASE-14407, HBASE-14313, HBASE-14621, HBASE-14501, and >>>> HBASE-13250. >>>> >>>> The full list of fixes included in this release is available at >>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12333152 >>>> and in the CHANGES.txt file included in the distribution. >>>> >>>> Please try out this candidate and vote +/-1 by 23:59 Pacific time on >>>> Friday, 2015-11-13 as to whether we should release these artifacts as >>>> HBase >>>> 1.1.3. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Nick >>>> >>>>
