On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 10:35 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> wrote:

> Waiting for reviews by committers for these two issues is holding up the
> 0.98.16 release. Any of yea, nay, or 'needs more work' will suffice.
> (smile)
>
> If there's little interest or available bandwidth in looking at such
> matters for the "LTS" 0.98 release going forward I would like your consent
> to take the initiative to auto-commit backports after waiting one week for
> review.
>
> +1 for the 0.98 branch.


>
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Please have a look at HBASE-14611 and HBASE-14738 if you get a chance.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> >    - Andy
> >
> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> > (via Tom White)
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
>    - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>



-- 
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera
// [email protected] // @jmhsieh

Reply via email to