2243 issues have been closed. I added a comment to each (e.g.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4708 )


On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Lars Francke <lars.fran...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Thank you St.Ack. Seems to work now. I'll bulk close issues without
> sending notification mails.
>
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 5:25 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>
>> Try now. Made you an administrator Lars.
>> St.Ack
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 5:07 AM, Lars Francke <lars.fran...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > That was quick: I'm not allowed to close issues.
>> >
>> > Would you consider giving me more permissions for JIRA also as per my
>> other
>> > previous mail?
>> >
>> > On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Lars Francke <lars.fran...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > As a first step I'm going to try and change all issues to closed that
>> > > match this JIRA filter:
>> > >
>> > > "project = HBASE AND status = Resolved AND fixVersion in
>> > > releasedVersions() AND fixVersion NOT IN unreleasedVersions()"
>> > >
>> > > This closes fewer issues than per your definition but leaves the
>> > > possibility of changing issues that have been applied to any
>> unreleased
>> > > version. Currently this filter matches 2243 issues.
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 9:32 PM, Lars Francke <lars.fran...@gmail.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> Sounds sensible. There's a whole bunch of them (~3600 in total but
>> > >> haven't checked yet whether they are in a released version).
>> > >>
>> > >> Yet another question: What should we tag things like infrastructure
>> > >> changes (Jenkins etc.)? A new "dummy" version "infra"? Similar for
>> > 0.89-fb
>> > >> issues (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4758) and some
>> of
>> > >> the very old issues from when HBase was a Hadoop subproject (Hadoop
>> > >> 0.13.0). Then there are a bunch of pseudo versions like hbase-7290 (
>> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE/fixforversion/12323900).
>> We
>> > >> could also leave all those empty as they haven't really been released
>> > but
>> > >> it makes these hygiene tasks a lot harder when you can't distinguish
>> > >> between "forgotten to set" and "not planned for any release".
>> > >>
>> > >> I'd love to clean up a bit but I don't have proper permissions. Not
>> sure
>> > >> if you can (or want to) only give those out for committers.
>> > >>
>> > >> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 7:56 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >>> Lars:
>> > >>> Resolved issues for released versions should be closed.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Cheers
>> > >>>
>> > >>> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 11:52 AM, Lars Francke <
>> lars.fran...@gmail.com>
>> > >>> wrote:
>> > >>>
>> > >>> > Thanks guys!
>> > >>> >
>> > >>> > Another related question: Resolved vs. Closed? Should all resolved
>> > >>> issues
>> > >>> > (especially the old ones) be closed? If so I'd be happy to work a
>> bit
>> > >>> on
>> > >>> > this but I don't have the proper permissions to do so.
>> > >>> >
>> > >>> > On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 5:15 PM, Andrew Purtell <
>> apurt...@apache.org>
>> > >>> > wrote:
>> > >>> >
>> > >>> > > I believe that's correct. Anyway, I don't think we object to
>> this
>> > >>> > practice.
>> > >>> > > Please feel free to help us with JIRA hygiene.
>> > >>> > >
>> > >>> > > On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 8:37 AM, Nick Dimiduk <
>> ndimi...@gmail.com>
>> > >>> wrote:
>> > >>> > >
>> > >>> > > > I think reopen and reclose is "how it is done."
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > On Monday, November 9, 2015, Lars Francke <
>> > lars.fran...@gmail.com>
>> > >>> > > wrote:
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > > Thanks Nicolas, that's good to know. Probably fixed in some
>> > kind
>> > >>> of
>> > >>> > > > > workflow then. Let's see if someone else has an idea.
>> > >>> > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Nicolas Liochon <
>> > >>> nkey...@gmail.com
>> > >>> > > > > <javascript:;>> wrote:
>> > >>> > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > fwiw, I gave it a try and I can't change the resolution
>> > myself,
>> > >>> > even
>> > >>> > > > if I
>> > >>> > > > > > have the admin bit on the jira.
>> > >>> > > > > > But may be a jira guru can do something about this...
>> > >>> > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 10:17 AM, Lars Francke <
>> > >>> > > lars.fran...@gmail.com
>> > >>> > > > > <javascript:;>>
>> > >>> > > > > > wrote:
>> > >>> > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > Hi,
>> > >>> > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > LarsG and I have been looking at a couple of JIRA issues
>> > >>> (861 to
>> > >>> > be
>> > >>> > > > > > > precise) that are listed as Resolved & Fixed but
>> without a
>> > >>> Fix
>> > >>> > > > version.
>> > >>> > > > > > > Some of them should have been closed as Invalid instead
>> of
>> > >>> Fixed
>> > >>> > > and
>> > >>> > > > > > > various other problems.
>> > >>> > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > We weren't able to change the Resolution though. We
>> worked
>> > >>> around
>> > >>> > > it
>> > >>> > > > by
>> > >>> > > > > > > reopening and closing again. Is there any other way to
>> do
>> > >>> this
>> > >>> > or a
>> > >>> > > > set
>> > >>> > > > > > of
>> > >>> > > > > > > permissions you could give me and/or Lars George?
>> > >>> > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > Thanks!
>> > >>> > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > Cheers,
>> > >>> > > > > > > Lars
>> > >>> > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > >
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > >
>> > >>> > >
>> > >>> > >
>> > >>> > > --
>> > >>> > > Best regards,
>> > >>> > >
>> > >>> > >    - Andy
>> > >>> > >
>> > >>> > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. -
>> Piet
>> > >>> Hein
>> > >>> > > (via Tom White)
>> > >>> > >
>> > >>> >
>> > >>>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>

Reply via email to