Nick, I looked at the three reports look good to me. Usually I'm most concerned about removals but HMaster is LimitedPrivate.
Jon On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 10:49 PM, Nick Dimiduk <ndimi...@apache.org> wrote: > For the curious, I've run the compatibility script on branch-1.1, against > both 1.1.0 [0] and 1.1.3RC0 [1] tags. Since the resolution on HBASE-14944 > was that the incompatible changes [2] were acceptable given their security > nature and limited scope, I've focused my attention on the changes that > have happened since 1.1.3RC0. > > The changes introduced for controlling additional operations with ProcV2 > are showing up in the latest reports. However, these too look limited in > scope to LimitedPrivate and/or Evolving classes, so they are acceptable by > my understanding of our compatibility guidelines. > > I'd appreciate another pair of eyes on these reports to make sure I didn't > miss anything. I'd hate to sink another RC due to things we should be aware > of well in advance. > > Thanks, > -n > > [0]: http://home.apache.org/~ndimiduk/1.1.0_branch-1.1_compat_report.html > [1]: > http://home.apache.org/~ndimiduk/1.1.3RC0_branch-1.1_compat_report.html > [2]: http://home.apache.org/~ndimiduk/1.1.0_1.1.3RC0_compat_report.html > > On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 11:26 PM, Nick Dimiduk <ndimi...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Happy New Year! > > > > I'd like to pick back up the branch-1.1 release. Since we're already busy > > with 1.2 and 0.98 is eminent, I'll let the dust settle on at least one of > > those releases before posting RC1; probably next week though possibly the > > week following, depending on how the votes go. > > > > As always, let me know if you have any concerns. > > > > Thanks, > > Nick > > > -- // Jonathan Hsieh (shay) // HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera // j...@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh
