+1

Ran test suite against hadoop 2.7.0 - passed
Exercised basic shell commands

On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 9:51 PM, <la...@apache.org> wrote:

> +1
>  - build from source- loaded 100m rows- executed some custom scan, load,
> and perf tests- nothing undue in the logs
>
> -- Lars
>
>       From: Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org>
>  To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" <dev@hbase.apache.org>
>  Sent: Friday, January 15, 2016 11:24 PM
>  Subject: [VOTE] The 1st HBase 0.98.17 release candidate (RC0) is available
>
> The 1st HBase 0.98.17 release candidate (RC0) is available for download at
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-0.98.17RC0 and Maven
> artifacts are also available in the temporary repository
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1123/ .
>
> The detailed source and binary compatibility report for this release with
> respect to the previous is available for your review at ​
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-0.98.17RC0/0.98.16.1_0.98.17RC0_compat_report.html
> ​
> . There is one change of note to the RpcServer
> LimitedPrivate(COPROC,PHOENIX)/Evolving interface that I believe is
> acceptable and have confirmed does not impact downstream coprocessors who
> implement RPC schedulers like Apache Phoenix.
>
> The 55 issues resolved in this release can be found at
> http://s.apache.org/F4Q .
>
> I have made the following preliminary assessments of this candidate:
> - Build with source artifact with RAT and enforcers enabled (-Prelease)
> completes successfully
> - Unit test suite passes (7u79)
> - Loaded 1M rows with LTT, no errors or unexpected messages observed, all
> keys verified, latencies within expected range
> - Build and unit tests with head of Apache Phoenix 4.x-HBase-0.98 branch
> passes (7u79)
>
> Signed with my new signing key 4B6D7DF3.
>
> ​Please try out the candidate and vote +1/0/-1. This vote will be open for
> at least 72 hours. Unless objection I will try to close it Friday January
> 22, 2016 if we have sufficient votes. Three +1 votes from PMC will be
> required to release.​
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
>   - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>
>
>

Reply via email to