+1. We have to move forward. Enis
On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 8:46 AM, Nick Dimiduk <ndimi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I'm good with it, though I'll also ask the question if there's anything > > goofy to be aware of re: HBase as someone upgrades their Hadoop? Probably > > nothing, but I've been surprised before; would be good to leave some > > breadcrumbs in our book. > > > > > I don't know myself (If anyone does, please shout and I'll stick the hurdle > into the doc). > Thanks Nick, > St.Ack > > > > > On Thursday, April 7, 2016, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > > > > > Currently 1.2.x is marked as NT -- i.e. not tested -- on hadoop-2.3.x > or > > > less. I am advocating we change the NT to X: i.e. NOT supported. > > > > > > You all good w/ that? > > > > > > St.Ack > > > P.S. Motivation is relatively minor, see HBASE-15550, but no harm in > > > letting go of old hadoops. > > > > > >