Yeah, branch-1.3 was cut some time ago and for a while most of commits going to branch-1 would also go to it, but last few days I'm trying to let only the following things go in:
- criticals and blockers - test fixes and other patches stabilizing the branch - cherry-picks that were missed earlier. - oneliners / doc changes etc Appreciate understanding and help :) -Mikhail On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Enis Söztutar <[email protected]> wrote: > nvm, it is there already. > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Enis Söztutar <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Mikhail, I suggest that we create the branch-1.3 now so that you can > > control what goes in and what not. branch-1 is free for all usually. > > > > Enis > > > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 9:24 PM, Mikhail Antonov <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> Suddenly we had kind of a spike in jiras filed with fixVersion=1.3 last > >> few > >> days, and I really want to get it out one of this days, so I want to > just > >> stabilize it now. > >> > >> I kicked some jiras labeled as "major" out of 1.3, and if there's > >> something > >> affecting branch-1.3 but not "Blocker" or "Critical" let's target it for > >> 1.3.1 and / or 1.4. > >> > >> Thanks! > >> Mikhail > >> > >> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 11:52 AM, Mikhail Antonov <[email protected] > > > >> wrote: > >> > >> > I'm not aware of any, and changes made to 1.3 shouldn't render 2.4 > >> > unsupportable. > >> > > >> > On the second thought, if we want to have to maintain less minor > >> releases > >> > in 1.* line and encourage folks to update, > >> > we need to keep maintaining those Hadoop versions, yeah. > >> > > >> > Let's leave 2.4 as supported. > >> > > >> > -Mikhail > >> > > >> > On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 7:11 AM, Sean Busbey <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > > >> >> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 7:00 PM, Mikhail Antonov < > [email protected] > >> > > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> > I'm thinking to move Hadoop 2.4.* from Supported to Not Tested, to > >> kind > >> >> of > >> >> > encourage people to move and have less versions to test. How many > >> people > >> >> > want to stick with Hadoop 2.4 yet upgrade to HBase 1.3? > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> Hadoop 2.4 is still considered a "safe bet" stable release for those > >> >> in LTM mode. > >> >> > >> >> Our compatibility guidelines say that we won't force an incompatible > >> >> dependency > >> >> upgrade in a minor version. Do we know if Hadoop 2.4 -> 2.5 includes > >> any > >> >> documented incompatibilities? > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> busbey > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Thanks, > >> > Michael Antonov > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Thanks, > >> Michael Antonov > >> > > > > > -- Thanks, Michael Antonov
