Sorry, wrong links: These are the phases: Phase 1: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE- <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14030>14030 Phase 2: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE- <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14123>14123 Phase 3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE- <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14414>14414
-Vlad On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Vladimir Rodionov <[email protected]> wrote: > These are the phases: > > Phase 1: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE- > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7912>14030 > Phase 2: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE- > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7912>14123 > Phase 3: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE- > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7912>14414 > > -Vlad > > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Enis Söztutar <[email protected]> wrote: > >> As you guys may already be familiar, Vladimir, Ted, Jerry and others have >> been developing the backup / restore functionality in a series of issues >> committed in the separate branch HBASE-7912[1]. >> >> Backup / Restore functionality is tracked as a 4-phase project, and the >> first two phases are complete and useable. We are now working on Phase 3 >> items, which are mostly improvements. We think that the current code in >> the >> branch containing all Phase 1 and Phase 2 items, and some Phase 3 items is >> useable on it's own, and we do not have to wait for all the subtickets to >> be finished to make it completely useable (as follow up tickets are mostly >> improvements or optimizations). The improvements in the works are all >> backwards compatible with the existing stuff. Thus, we would like to >> propose that the branch HBASE-7912 be merged into master. The parent jira >> has a design doc that goes into details about the implementation and >> design >> choices in case you are interested[2]. >> >> Most of the changes are largely non-intrusive and confined to the >> backup subsystem. >> The unit tests have been passing on manual runs and we (hortonworks) have >> been running the integration tests as well as some other shell-based >> system >> tests on a forked version of the code. Most of the work has been reviewed >> by 1, 2 or 3 committers already (mostly Ted, myself and Jerry). >> >> What do you guys think? Is it time to call a vote? Any concerns or >> feedback >> appreciated. >> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7912 >> [2] >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12816339/HBaseBackupAndRestore%20-0.91.pdf >> >> Enis >> > >
