Thanks Dima! I rerun test with you suggestion, and it passed! (hbase --config ~/hadoop/hbase/f04_conf/ org.apache.hadoop.hbase.test.IntegrationTestBigLinkedList loop 1 3 2500000 /tmp/itbll 3 100000 25 -m serverKilling)
So +1 for me 2016-09-05 21:33 GMT+08:00 Dima Spivak <dimaspi...@apache.org>: > Hey Heng, > > You need to ensure that the number of nodes in ITBLL is a multiple of > width*wrap (defaults to 25M, but can be configured by adding two more args > to the test invocation). See: the 0.98.22 RC0 thread, where I forgot this > :). > > On Monday, September 5, 2016, Heng Chen <heng.chen.1...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I will test it with 1.2.2 again. Not sure about it now. > > > > 2016-09-05 20:26 GMT+08:00 Stack <st...@duboce.net <javascript:;>>: > > > > > Thanks Heng. Do you know if 1.2.2 or earlier versions of 1.2 failed in > > > similar way or is this new phenomenon? > > > Thanks, > > > St.Ack > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 1:26 AM, Heng Chen <heng.chen.1...@gmail.com > > <javascript:;>> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > - Unpacked source and binary tarballs: layout looks good > > > > - Started up a 3-node cluster (Hadoop 2.7.2, Oracle JDK 8u20, 2 > > master, 2 > > > > rs) from binary tarballs. > > > > - Verified that the web UI works and shell works > > > > - build from source and run test case (JDK 8u20), passed. > > > > - Run LTT with 1M rows (100 writers, 30 readers (100%), 10 updaters > > > > (20%)) all keys verified, no warns, no errors, no failed, > latencies > > > > lgtm > > > > - Run ITBLL with 2M rows (slowDeterministic), passed. > > > > > > > > Run ITBLL with 2M rows (serverKilling) has some issues. I run two > > times, > > > > all failed ( hbase --config ~/hadoop/hbase/f04_conf/ > > > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.test.IntegrationTestBigLinkedList loop 1 1 > > > > 2000000 /tmp/it_16224_v0 1 -m serverKilling) > > > > > > > > The first time, after kill components in cluster serval times (1 > > active > > > > master, 1 backup master, 1 active RS, 1 dead RS), some regions fall > in > > > > Failed_open state on active RS, so balance could not run, and ITBLL > > > hang. > > > > Then i start the dead RS manually, and stop the active RS, ITBLL > > > could > > > > go on. But after some time, ITBLL hang again due to backup master > > could > > > > not be startup, so i do manually again, and ITBLL go on , and at > > least > > > > verified failed. > > > > > > > > > > > > The second time, there is no abnormal issues during ITBLL, but > > verified > > > > failed. > > > > > > > > Upload the logs > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2016-09-03 0:33 GMT+08:00 Misty Stanley-Jones <mi...@apache.org > > <javascript:;>>: > > > > > > > >> +1 based on OSX 10.11.6 > > > >> > > > >> Steps taken: > > > >> > > > >> Binary tar.gz: > > > >> - Download the tarball > > > >> - Test the MD5sum, it matched > > > >> - Extract the tarball > > > >> - Start HBase in standalone mode > > > >> - Start the CLI > > > >> - Access the master and regionServer web UIs > > > >> - Stop HBase > > > >> > > > >> Source tar.gz: > > > >> - Download the tarball > > > >> - Test the MD5sum, it matched > > > >> - Extract the tarball > > > >> - Build using Maven 3.39 and JDK 1.8.0_102 on OSX and 'mvn clean > > install > > > >> --fail-at-end' and let the full test suite run > > > >> -- A few failed tests but each passed when I ran it separately. Not > > > >> surprising since I was running all this on a Macbook. > > > >> - Start HBase in standalone mode > > > >> - Start the CLI > > > >> - Access the master and regionServer web UIs > > > >> - Stop HBase > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016, at 11:14 AM, Stack wrote: > > > >> > The first release candidate for HBase 1.2.3 (hbase-1.2.3RC0) is > > > >> > available for download at: > > > >> > > > > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-1.2.3RC0/ > > > >> > > > > >> > Maven artifacts are also available in a staging repository at: > > > >> > > > > >> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache > > > >> hbase-1149/ > > > >> > > > > >> > Artifacts are signed with my key (30CD0996) published up in our > KEYS > > > >> > file at https://www-us.apache.org/dist/hbase/KEYS. > > > >> > > > > >> > The RC is tagged 1.2.3RC0 (I'll sign the tag the next time > > through...) > > > >> > > > > >> > The detailed source and binary compatibility report vs 1.2.2 has > > been > > > >> > published for your review, at: > > > >> > > > > >> > http://people.apache.org/~stack/1.2.2_1.2.3RC0_compat_ > report.html > > > >> > > > > >> > HBase 1.2.3 is the third patch release in the HBase 1.2 line, > > > continuing > > > >> > on > > > >> > the theme of bringing a stable, reliable database to the Hadoop > and > > > >> NoSQL > > > >> > communities. This release includes over 48 bug fixes since 1.2.2. > In > > > >> > particular it addresses an API incompatibility uncovered by our > > Apache > > > >> > Phoenix bothers and sisters in our Table Interface: HBASE-16420. > > > >> > > > > >> > The full list of fixes included in this release is available at: > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje > > > >> ctId=12310753&version=12336053 > > > >> > > > > >> > and in the CHANGES.txt file included in the distribution. > > > >> > > > > >> > Please try out this candidate and vote +/-1 by 23:59 Pacific time > on > > > >> > Monday, 2016-09-05 as to whether we should release these artifacts > > as > > > >> > HBase > > > >> > 1.2.3. > > > >> > > > > >> > Thanks, > > > >> > St.Ack > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > -Dima >
