just a remark. my query was not about tools using MR (everyone i think is
ok with those).
the topic was about: "are we ok with running MR jobs from Master and RSs
code?" since this will be the first time we do this

Matteo


On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Devaraj Das <d...@hortonworks.com> wrote:

> Very much agree; for tools like ExportSnapshot / Backup / Restore, it's
> fine to be dependent on MR. MR is the right framework for such. We should
> also do compactions using MR (just saying :) )
> ________________________________________
> From: Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 2:00 PM
> To: dev@hbase.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] MR jobs started by Master or RS
>
> I agree - backup / restore is in the same category as import / export.
>
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Andrew Purtell <andrew.purt...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Backup is extra tooling around core in my opinion. Like import or export.
> > Or the optional MOB tool. It's fine.
> >
> > > On Sep 22, 2016, at 1:50 PM, Matteo Bertozzi <mberto...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > What's the latest opinion around running MR jobs from hbase (Master or
> > RS)?
> > >
> > > I remember in the past that there was discussion about not having MR
> has
> > > direct dependency of hbase.
> > >
> > > I think some of discussion where around MOB that had a MR job to
> compact,
> > > that later was transformed in a non-MR job to be merged, I think we
> had a
> > > similar discussion for log split/replay.
> > >
> > > the latest is the new Backup feature (HBASE-7912), that runs a MR job
> > from
> > > the master to copy data or restore data.
> > > (backup is also "not really core" as in.. if you don't use backup
> you'll
> > > not end up running MR jobs, but this was probably true for MOB as in
> "if
> > > you don't enable MOB you don't need MR")
> > >
> > > any thoughts? do we a rule that says "we don't want to have hbase run
> MR
> > > jobs, only tool started manually by the user can do that". or can we
> > start
> > > adding MR calls around without problems?
> >
>

Reply via email to